Re the 16TB SSDs I mentioned earlier?
768TB in a 2U chassis. 2 million iops. 16PB per rack, with 42 million iops. Probably for only $10 million per rack.
For non-geeks, to put this in perspective, Wikipedia is 12GB compressed. 70GB for the pictures. Let's call it a 100GB. You could keep 160,000 copies of wikipedia on hand.
Google's entire index is only 200TB. For $10m, you could keep 80 copies of Google around.
You'd only need 5 of these to store all the uploaded Youtube videoes per year.
At SSD speeds. 653,594,771 SSDs, at $7000. $4,575,163,398,692 all of humanity's data at SSD speed. Still pretty expensive, and ignoring ancillary costs like housing, network, etc.
Now if you didn't care about speed or compactness, there's the BackBlaze Storage Pod 5.0. $7,974 per 180TB, or $0.044/GB
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/cloud-storage-hardware/55,555,556 pods to store 10ZB * $7974 = $443,000,003,544. A paltry $443 billion dollars to store all of humanity's information. And all you'd need to do is network them. Or more likely, store only the indexes online and keep the pods themselves sealed up and offline. So for half a trillion dollars, you could get a turnkey system with everything you needed, storage side. At 1/12 the price of MicroSD or SSD!