I'm not saying the dip isn't partially related to him, but given recent events in the market, it's going to be hard to pin the entire dip on him. Hell, given the news I heard yesterday and the entirety of the market's problems lately, his actual effect might have been positive, just not enough to offset a larger loss. I'm simply not comfortable blaming the loss on him, nor am I comfortable blaming anything negative on him unless there is a verifiable connection.
Chris