Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: gunsmith on October 26, 2022, 08:47:32 PM

Title: only cops should be allowed to handle guns
Post by: gunsmith on October 26, 2022, 08:47:32 PM
 go to 0:24 and watch to 0:27 this cop, a corporal or sgt has less sense than I did when I was a boy scout, he is trying to destroy his left hand ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhvBY-oFDt0

some wanna be rap star got paranoid on drugs and fired a warning shot at invisible people.
the cops seem just as dangerous


later in the video it gets even worse!
Title: Re: only cops should be allowed to handle guns
Post by: Perd Hapley on October 26, 2022, 10:07:39 PM
...fired a warning shot at invisible people.


Nothing wrong with that. What do you think ghost guns are for?
Title: Re: only cops should be allowed to handle guns
Post by: WLJ on October 26, 2022, 10:17:50 PM
As long as you do through a door with a shotgun it's Biden approved
Title: Re: only cops should be allowed to handle guns
Post by: HankB on October 27, 2022, 09:08:10 AM
Oh, boy . . . I was probably 4 years old when my Daddy began drumming firearm safety into my little skull full of mush, and one of the things I was taught was that you DON'T put your hand over the muzzle of a gun, because bad things can happen if it fires. Thanks to his early teaching, that was a bad habit I was prevented from ever acquiring. (Thanks, Dad.  :angel: )

Nothing wrong with that. What do you think ghost guns are for?
It'll be hard to top that response.  :rofl:
Title: Re: only cops should be allowed to handle guns
Post by: Fly320s on October 27, 2022, 10:22:32 AM
I expected this thread to be about the cop who shot himself in the hand... and killed his friend in the process.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/california-police-officer-shoots-self-hand-kills-another-man-while-cleaning-personal-gun-cops-say
Title: Re: only cops should be allowed to handle guns
Post by: gunsmith on October 27, 2022, 08:42:14 PM
Nothing wrong with that. What do you think ghost guns are for?
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: