R.I.P. Scout26
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/feb/19/troop-left-to-fend-for-themselves-after-army-was-w/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSShttp://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/feb/20/cover-up-army-historian-says-report-on-deadly-afgh/blah blah blah So many issues in both articles that I won't bother elaborating. The weapon is not optimal but this is a bunch of retreaded stuff. Someone at Washington Times must have some skin in the game regarding a new rifle.
I wish they would pick something new for the combat arms guys
Holy hell. It's like giving a loaded gun to a chimpanzee...
the last thing you need is rabies. You're already angry enough as it is.OTOH, there wouldn't be a tweeker left in Georgia...
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! AND THROW SOME STEAK ON THE GRILL!
Then the bitching about the new weapon could happen while everybody pines for the old one. Such is Infantry Law.
Retired Army Maj. Gen. Robert Scales, an artillery officer who earned the Silver Star in Vietnam, is a prominent M4 critic.He said its 5.56-caliber bullet is too small and the gas-piston firing system is prone to stoppage. He said better weapons — the German Heckler-Koch G36 and Russian AK-74 (a version of the venerable AK-47) — use superior firing systems.
From the first link:The M4 carbine has a gas piston?
No.