Author Topic: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.  (Read 4906 times)

Marnoot

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,965
Charges Against 'New Black Panthers' Dropped by Obama Justice Dept.

Three men were accused of trying to threaten voters and block poll and campaign workers by the threat of force -- one even brandishing what prosecutors call a deadly weapon.

FOXNews.com

Friday, May 29, 2009

Charges brought against three members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense under the Bush administration have been dropped by the Obama Justice Department, FOX News has learned.

The charges stemmed from an incident at a Philadelphia polling place on Election Day 2008 when three members of the party were accused of trying to threaten voters and block poll and campaign workers by the threat of force -- one even brandishing what prosecutors call a deadly weapon.

The three black panthers, Minister King Samir Shabazz, Malik Zulu Shabazz and Jerry Jackson were charged in a civil complaint in the final days of the Bush administration with violating the voter rights act by using coercion, threats and intimidation. Shabazz allegedly held a nightstick or baton that prosecutors said he pointed at people and menacingly tapped it. Prosecutors also say he "supports racially motivated violence against non-blacks and Jews."

The Obama administration won the case last month, but moved to dismiss the charges on May 15.

The complaint says the men hurled racial slurs at both blacks and whites.

A poll watcher who provided an affidavit to prosecutors in the case noted that Bartle Bull, who worked as a civil rights lawyer in the south in the 1960's and is a former campaign manager for Robert Kennedy, said it was the most blatant form of voter intimidation he had ever seen.

In his affidavit, obtained by FOX News, Bull wrote "I watched the two uniformed men confront voters and attempt to intimidate voters. They were positioned in a location that forced every voter to pass in close proximity to them. The weapon was openly displayed and brandished in plain sight of voters."

He also said they tried to "interfere with the work of other poll observers ... whom the uniformed men apparently believed did not share their preferences politically," noting that one of the panthers turned toward the white poll observers and said "you are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."

A spokesman for the Department of Justice told FOX News, "The Justice Department was successful in obtaining an injunction that prohibits the defendant who brandished a weapon outside a Philadelphia polling place from doing so again. Claims were dismissed against the other defendants based on a careful assessment of the facts and the law. The department is committed to the vigorous prosecution of those who intimidate, threaten or coerce anyone exercising his or her sacred right to vote."

So voter intimidation is something the Obama administration will overlook so long as minorities were the perpetrator? Or is there some other reason for doing this?

They obtained "an injunction that prohibits the defendant who brandished a weapon outside a Philadelphia polling place from doing so again." If brandishing it was illegal in the first place, what good is such an injunction? They'd probably just drop the charges again, if it happens again.

Kingcreek

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,523
Racism is the belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.[1] In the case of institutional racism, certain racial groups may be denied rights or benefits, or get preferential treatment, while reverse racism favours members of a historically disadvantaged group at the expense of those of a historically advantaged group.
What we have here is failure to communicate.

AZRedhawk44

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,974
I remember seeing this on the nooz.

I was hoping for some ventilation of those fellas by rapidly accelerated lead and/or copper.

I know that if someone blocks off my polling place with this type of jackassery... I'm going back to the truck or back home to enforce my right to vote.  Men fought and died to secure it for me; I would be doing them a disservice if I did not have the courage to fight for my own right to vote.

Carrying weapons is illegal at polling places, sure.  But you can't vote "late."  You've got one day.  Games like this meddle with the demographics of voters and are deliberate attempts to sway outcome.  There's no time for due process in this case; each minute these games are allowed to continue is as many as 5 votes that don't get to be cast.  Maybe more.  It is inherently evil and a deliberate sabotage of American principles.

I personally would probably return with an AR, enact a declared citizen's arrest and hold them at gunpoint since they are holding weapons (clubs/nightsticks).  Then organize the voting line to continue voting while police sorted out my actions and theirs; getting as many witness statements on my side as possible.

The outcome would likely suck for me... but this is absolutely brutish behavior.  It isn't that far to get from voter intimidation to machetes in the deep of Africa.
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner

I reject your authoritah!

RocketMan

  • Mad Rocket Scientist
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,625
  • Semper Fidelis
Quote
So voter intimidation is something the Obama administration will overlook so long as minorities were the perpetrator? Or is there some other reason for doing this?

In this case, voter intimidation was okay as long as the right voters were intimidated.  I'd be willing to bet that those that made clear their intention to vote for The One had no problem accessing the polling place.
If there really was intelligent life on other planets, we'd be sending them foreign aid.

Conservatives see George Orwell's "1984" as a cautionary tale.  Progressives view it as a "how to" manual.

My wife often says to me, "You are evil and must be destroyed." She may be right.

Liberals believe one should never let reason, logic and facts get in the way of a good emotional argument.

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,643
In this case, voter intimidation was okay as long as the right voters were intimidated. 
QFT.

Same reasoning holds for Minnesota stuffing the ballot boxes to give Franken a win. (In case you hadn't heard, a couple of dozen precincts turned in vote tallies with more total votes than they had actual voters. Last I heard, the numbers were being included in the count.)
Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Racism is the belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.[1] In the case of institutional racism, certain racial groups may be denied rights or benefits, or get preferential treatment, while reverse racism favours members of a historically disadvantaged group at the expense of those of a historically advantaged group.

This has nothing to do with race.  It has to do with a standard socialist ideal of winning at all costs.
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

longeyes

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,405
Socialism is the way it's going be sold.

We are talking here about race-based fascism.
"Domari nolo."

Thug: What you lookin' at old man?
Walt Kowalski: Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have messed with? That's me.

Molon Labe.

Marnoot

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,965
This has nothing to do with race.  It has to do with a standard socialist ideal of winning at all costs.

I agree that this was probably dropped by the Obama administration due to stated socialist ideal, not racist motives, but for the perpetrators ("you are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker"), it was racial in nature in addition to any socialist ideals.

Can you imagine the public outcry had the situation been reversed? Some KKK thugs intimidating voters, and one says "you still gonna be ruled by the white man, n*****," to a black observer, while threatening people with a bat. I don't see any difference in severity between the two, but if McCain had won the election, then dropped charges against the hypothetical klanners it would be headline news on all stations, and the public outcry would be loud and piercing.

There should be a public outcry in such a situation and there should be a public outcry in this one, but there won't be any.

AZRedhawk44

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,974
Quote from: Marnoot
There should be a public outcry in such a situation and there should be a public outcry in this one, but there won't be any.

Then cry!  There won't be any if you don't do it.

Contact:

AskDOJ@usdoj.gov (The bucket at the Dept of Justice)

http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ (No email, but I think president@whitehouse.gov goes to a bulk email junk bin still that gets read by some peon.)

WH Comments: 202-456-1111
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner

I reject your authoritah!

Werewolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,126
  • Lead, Follow or Get the HELL out of the WAY!
This has nothing to do with race.  It has to do with a standard socialist ideal of winning at all costs.
Yeah.

As long as the winner was of the right race...
Life is short, Break the rules, Forgive quickly, Kiss slowly, Love
truly, Laugh uncontrollably, And never regret anything that made you smile.

Fight Me Online

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,431
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #10 on: May 29, 2009, 06:14:41 PM »
The lead-in:

I was hoping for some ventilation of those fellas by rapidly accelerated lead and/or copper.

I know that if someone blocks off my polling place with this type of jackassery... I'm going back to the truck or back home to enforce my right to vote.  Men fought and died to secure it for me; I would be doing them a disservice if I did not have the courage to fight for my own right to vote.

Wait for it...

The irony:
Quote
It isn't that far to get from voter intimidation to machetes in the deep of Africa
.

Using guns in the deep of America is different? 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #11 on: May 29, 2009, 06:15:39 PM »
Yes, it is.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #12 on: May 29, 2009, 06:18:19 PM »
I fail to see the irony. "Machetes in Africa" clearly refers to the actions of the aggressors, whereas AZ was proposing using force to stop the aforementioned aggressors. Irony fail.  :laugh:
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

Boomhauer

  • Former Moderator, fired for embezzlement and abuse of power
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,320
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #13 on: May 29, 2009, 06:46:58 PM »
Quote
I know that if someone blocks off my polling place with this type of jackassery... I'm going back to the truck or back home to enforce my right to vote.  Men fought and died to secure it for me; I would be doing them a disservice if I did not have the courage to fight for my own right to vote.

Amen.

My grandmother had death threats made against her many decades ago because she was one of the few Republican voters in a heavily Democrat controlled county.

That will not happen to me.
Quote from: Ben
Holy hell. It's like giving a loaded gun to a chimpanzee...

Quote from: bluestarlizzard
the last thing you need is rabies. You're already angry enough as it is.

OTOH, there wouldn't be a tweeker left in Georgia...

Quote from: Balog
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! AND THROW SOME STEAK ON THE GRILL!

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,431
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #14 on: May 29, 2009, 09:23:36 PM »
So some guys are using naughty words and brandishing a night stick. 

Shall we call the police?

Or shall we shoot them? 

I know:  What would the Hutu do?   ;/
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

AZRedhawk44

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,974
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #15 on: May 29, 2009, 10:32:33 PM »
You're right... there's obviously appropriate levels of escalation.

And obviously the police failed to respond in this situation.  That's why it was reported as voter intimidation, and not assault.  If it were over and resolved quickly, it would have been simple assault.

Firstly, I know that my city PD as well as county sherriff (Joe Arpaio) would get medival on anyone playing this stunt in AZ.  Secondly, I know that significant portions of my common citizenry wouldn't stand for it.

And that's why this happened in Philly instead.  Because the PD is a combination of corrupt and inept, and the stand-up people in town are already intimidated by PC behavior standards.

One day in the future, AZ will be just as sapped.  It's been happening for at least the last 10 years, probably longer.

Frankly... I don't think I'd react the same way if I did live in Philly.  I'd call the police and wait for the response, probably.  I think I'd push my luck and risk a fight, perhaps even a beat down.  Maybe call some friends and try to outnumber them first, if the police were inept at dealing with it.  I don't know.  Frankly, I just wouldn't live in a place like that to begin with.

Which is why I'd stand up against it in AZ.  I'm not a native here, but I like it and I don't want to see it morph into Philly or New York or Chicago or Detroit.

And if AZ sinks to that standard, I'll move somewhere else, until there's nowhere left to move.  And then it'll be too late for anyone to make a stand, because all the opportunities to stop small injustices passed us by in favor of nonconflict.

And it was all fistful's fault.  :|
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner

I reject your authoritah!

brimic

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,270
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #16 on: May 30, 2009, 03:51:21 AM »
How about that, Obama has brownshirts ready for hire.
"now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb" -Dark Helmet

"AK47's belong in the hands of soldiers mexican drug cartels"-
Barack Obama

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #17 on: May 30, 2009, 09:37:50 PM »
And obviously the police failed to respond in this situation.



obviously you haven't seen the video of the cops showing up
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

Tuco

  • Fastest non-sequitur in the West.
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,110
  • If you miss you had better miss very well
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #18 on: May 30, 2009, 09:54:50 PM »
So some guys are using naughty words and brandishing a night stick. 

Shall we call the police?

Or shall we shoot them? 

I know:  What would the Hutu
Americans
Quote
do?   ;/


Walk around them and vote.
7-11 was a part time job.

agricola

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,248
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #19 on: May 31, 2009, 06:18:55 PM »
sorry, what?

Quote
The Obama administration won the case last month, but moved to dismiss the charges on May 15.

is this correct?  how can you dismiss the charges after a finding of guilt has been achieved?
"Idiot!  A long life eating mush is best."
"Make peace, you fools"

Marnoot

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,965
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #20 on: June 01, 2009, 01:37:35 AM »
sorry, what?

is this correct?  how can you dismiss the charges after a finding of guilt has been achieved?

The Obamessiah will find a way.

seeker_two

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,922
  • In short, most intelligence is false.
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #21 on: June 01, 2009, 02:37:34 AM »
So some guys are using naughty words and brandishing a night stick. 

Shall we call the police?

Or shall we shoot them? 

I know:  What would the Hutu do?   ;/

Bring a bigger stick.....this is another situation where a good, stout walking cane makes for a great SD option....  :cool:
Impressed yet befogged, they grasped at his vivid leading phrases, seeing only their surface meaning, and missing the deeper current of his thought.

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

K Frame

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 44,394
  • I Am Inimical
Re: Charges against 'New Black Panthers' dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
« Reply #23 on: June 01, 2009, 12:05:58 PM »
Closed.

Name calling, Godwinning, handwringing, and a tinge of conspiracy on top.

Jesus, people...  :rolleyes:


Read the announcement that Jamis pasted in.

If you don't, then you may not know why you've been banned until you're banned.
Carbon Monoxide, sucking the life out of idiots, 'tards, and fools since man tamed fire.