Author Topic: Fed judge rules AR's "dangerous & unusual", not covered by 2nd Amendment  (Read 4291 times)

brimic

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,270
Re: Fed judge rules AR's "dangerous & unusual", not covered by 2nd Amendment
« Reply #25 on: August 14, 2014, 02:10:02 PM »
I wonder how this judge would have ruled in the 1880's on lever guns? :)



...Or the Taurus Judge!!!!1111
Its a shotgun. its a handgun, its a handful of death!
And its not used by the military.
"now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb" -Dark Helmet

"AK47's belong in the hands of soldiers mexican drug cartels"-
Barack Obama

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Fed judge rules AR's "dangerous & unusual", not covered by 2nd Amendment
« Reply #26 on: August 14, 2014, 02:36:12 PM »
...Or the Taurus Judge!!!!1111
Its a shotgun. its a handgun, its a handful of death!
And its not used by the military.

I would fully support a bill that rolled back the Hughes Amendment in exchange for banning the Judge.
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

makattak

  • Dark Lord of the Cis
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,022
Re: Fed judge rules AR's "dangerous & unusual", not covered by 2nd Amendment
« Reply #27 on: August 14, 2014, 02:42:00 PM »
...Or the Taurus Judge!!!!1111
Its a shotgun. its a handgun, its a handful of death!
And its not used by the military.

Forget the judge, how about a pistol that fires shot from a SECOND BARREL!?!?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LeMat_Revolver

Obviously too dangerous to entrust to citizens.
I wish the Ring had never come to me. I wish none of this had happened.

So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us. There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil. Bilbo was meant to find the Ring. In which case, you also were meant to have it. And that is an encouraging thought

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Fed judge rules AR's "dangerous & unusual", not covered by 2nd Amendment
« Reply #28 on: August 14, 2014, 02:50:42 PM »
Forget the judge, how about a pistol that fires shot from a SECOND BARREL!?!?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LeMat_Revolver

Obviously too dangerous to entrust to citizens.

Actually that might be considered a SBS if it used fixed cartridges.
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

makattak

  • Dark Lord of the Cis
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,022
Re: Fed judge rules AR's "dangerous & unusual", not covered by 2nd Amendment
« Reply #29 on: August 14, 2014, 02:58:03 PM »
Actually that might be considered a SBS if it used fixed cartridges.

There's a later version that apparently did use centerfire cartridges. I'm just not certain if that included the shotgun barrel.
I wish the Ring had never come to me. I wish none of this had happened.

So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us. There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil. Bilbo was meant to find the Ring. In which case, you also were meant to have it. And that is an encouraging thought

Phantom Warrior

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 926
Re: Fed judge rules AR's "dangerous & unusual", not covered by 2nd Amendment
« Reply #30 on: August 15, 2014, 03:19:06 PM »
Circuit split? The judge who heard the challenge to the NY "SAFE" Act ruled that the AR-15 IS in customary, popular use.

Not to be the pedantic law school dropout, but it isn't a circuit split unless the respective courts of appeals for those districts (2nd Cir for NY, 4th Cir for MD) hear the cases and rule differently on whether the AR-15 is in common use.  If those circuits both apply Heller et al. correctly there will be no Circuit split and no need for the Supreme Court to straighten things out.

Angel Eyes

  • Lying dog-faced pony soldier
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,343
  • You're not diggin'
Re: Fed judge rules AR's "dangerous & unusual", not covered by 2nd Amendment
« Reply #31 on: August 15, 2014, 05:11:46 PM »
There's a later version that apparently did use centerfire cartridges. I'm just not certain if that included the shotgun barrel.

If the revolver cylinder chambers self-contained cartridges and the shotgun barrel is still a muzzleloader, would it be an SBS?  Common sense says no, but this is the Feds we're talking about.
"End of quote.  Repeat the line."
  - Joe 'Ron Burgundy' Biden