Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: ilbob on September 19, 2008, 04:14:41 AM

Title: continuation of thr thread about to be closed
Post by: ilbob on September 19, 2008, 04:14:41 AM
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?p=4929614#post4929614

Title: Re: continuation of thr thread about to be closed
Post by: grampster on September 19, 2008, 04:54:14 AM
The OP makes a good point about not listening to what the pols say, rather look at what they have done.

If every American took the time to do this, no one but a flaming socialist would vote for Obama/Biden.  The record is that clear.
Title: Re: continuation of thr thread about to be closed
Post by: 209 on September 19, 2008, 05:51:07 AM
It takes more than voting in the President.  There's a whole slew of other pols who need to be voted out.  There 35 Senator seats up for election and 435 Representative seats to be filled.  I doubt we'll see a major change though.

If Obama got elected and the Senate and House were against him, he could go down in history as the worst President we ever had.  Likewise if McCain makes it and both chambers are Dem, he'll either fold to their wishes or he'll be viewed as a bad President. 
Title: Re: continuation of thr thread about to be closed
Post by: freedom lover on September 20, 2008, 06:01:27 AM
Quote from the OP:

Quote
What can we do to make the Democratic party drop the issue of gun banning?

Nothing. They are devoted to their own illogical philosophical ideals and only interested in their party's well being and personal power. Most Dems and other politicians have lost touch with reality, honesty, and history. They don't care about the common man. This should be obvious to any knowledgeable citizen.

As it has been stated before, we must seek out truth and find out what politicians' records consist of before we vote.
Title: Re: continuation of thr thread about to be closed
Post by: MechAg94 on September 20, 2008, 06:54:08 AM
I agree on just not voting for them.  To me, gun control is a good litmus test for politicians.  It tells you something about their view of citizens and the public and the role of government. 

My problem with gun banners is not only gun control, but that type also seem to be soft on crime and criminal punishment, and also want to pull back on law enforcement.  The net effect is they disarm citizens and enable criminals.  IMO, that is the main reason that crime is worse in areas with gun control.  It is the combination of dumb ideas, not just one thing. 
Title: Re: continuation of thr thread about to be closed
Post by: oldfart on September 20, 2008, 08:50:26 AM
"It takes more than voting in the President.  There's a whole slew of other pols who need to be voted out.  There 35 Senator seats up for election and 435 Representative seats to be filled.  I doubt we'll see a major change though.


I think the problem is even more basic that what you describe.  Suppose we were able to throw out all 535 or so elected officials at once and install brand new, fresh-faced neophytes in their places.  Those new legislators would need staff.  They'd need people who knew where the better bars were, which street to take to get home, what neighborhoods to stay out of, etc.  Those staff members (whose names we'll probably never know) are also the people who write legislation, interpret rules and advise their boss.  And those people stay there through one administration after another, giving the same advice to each occupant of the office.

Let's face it folks:  The President isn't going to change much beyond the curtains and the same can be said for Senators and Congresscritters.  Maybe, someday in the far distant future someone will determine that what we really needed was a nuclear strike on Washington D.C.
Title: Re: continuation of thr thread about to be closed
Post by: Matthew Carberry on September 20, 2008, 12:42:19 PM
The reason we need a huge bureaucracy that resists change is not due to the country getting bigger or the world getting more complex, it is simply because we have allowed the Feds to take on far more than their Constitutional list of duties.

Reduce those back to something remotely related to the Connie and the bureaucracy would dry up.

The fix isn't to "vote the bastards out", it's to cut the excess growth back, that will remove the opportunities for corruption to a great degree.
Title: Re: continuation of thr thread about to be closed
Post by: kentucky_Dave on September 20, 2008, 03:45:23 PM
Well this issue is tough.
(Please bear with me as I do my very best to contain myself and not begin a rant on just how bad our supposed leaders have gotten)

I have voted Democrat in every election cycle...until this one.
I left the Party for 3 primary reasons (others not listed):

Title: Re: continuation of thr thread about to be closed
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on September 20, 2008, 03:55:46 PM
Hey dave I've never voted for a democrat at the national level though that could change but I could apply better than 85% of what you said and make it stick to the republican party. Its why I wish for a VIABLE third menu choice. Sadly i'm still waiting.
Maybe if both sides alienate enough of their base they will create that third party. since thus far the third parties seem to need the help.  It could end up being like what old man marriot said about unions. "unions don't need to recruit poor management does it for them" It might just be me but I seem to find more disaffected folks than ever on both sides of the aisle.
Title: Re: continuation of thr thread about to be closed
Post by: drewtam on September 20, 2008, 07:03:50 PM
The reason we need a huge bureaucracy that resists change is not due to the country getting bigger or the world getting more complex, it is simply because we have allowed the Feds to take on far more than their Constitutional list of duties.

Reduce those back to something remotely related to the Connie and the bureaucracy would dry up.

The fix isn't to "vote the bastards out", it's to cut the excess growth back, that will remove the opportunities for corruption to a great degree.
Talk about hitting the nail on the head.

Power corrupts. Of course big money goes after lobbying! They make the rules of what you can and can't do! Any business and poltical group would be insane not to try influencing the people who carry absolute power over their being. When the taxes are that high and power is that concentrate, of course everyone tries to plead the case that they are special and need tax breaks and subsidies to survive. Farmers needs tax breaks and subsidies, Manufacturing needs tax breaks and subsidies, Financial markets needs subsidies, Service industry needs tax breaks and subsidies. Everyone is special and needs a break so they all need to lobby to get it done.

Keep your eye on the ball and remember the big five:
1, Social Security
2, Medicare, Medicaid
3, DoD
4, Interest on debt
5, Everything else

To repeat what carebear said, if the power wasn't there, nobody else would be either.