It did hit one nail squarely on the head. "It may be objected that if weapons that are most useful in military service - M –16 rifles and the like — may be banned, then the Second Amendment right is completely detached from the prefatory clause."
Ayep. Tis why Miller never made sense to me. Military weapons should be more protected than say, hunting firearms.
I suspect this will be overturned when it goes federal. CA Court of Appeal just made the process longer.