Lying by omission is standard practice in the MSM. Why include material facts which contradict your own views?
A lot of times this is due to higher-up editors and not necessarily because of the original reporter. Or in this case, the photographer, who as a matter of "good photography" and composition, would probably have included the full human figure in his original framing.
Some folks would say that omitting material facts is not lying in terms of actually telling an untruth, but I wonder how it fits in to the concept of "thou shalt not bear false witness." I heard that phrase somewhere, but don't remember where.
Terry, 230RN