I'd like to hedge my bet...
1. I just had a chance to read up on this a bit, and see that the Bostock case (gay softball league) was joined with two other cases. One is a trans funeral director. The funeral home has conceded that it fired the now her because of the trans issue.
2. In reading up more on Bostock, he was an award winning director of CASA in Atlanta, with very good performance reviews. He joined the softball league in 2013. Not long afterwards, his county supervisor initiated an internal audit of the program's finances. A meeting with the board for his CASA program was held, with Bostock present. It is alleged that at that meeting, the softball league and Bostock's orientation were questioned and disparaged. He was fired after the meeting for “conduct unbecoming of a county employee.”
3.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/10/argument-analysis-justices-divided-on-federal-protections-for-lgbt-employees/ This is a page that gives summaries of arguments and questions/comments from the bench. In appears that Gorsuch is leaning in favor of granting Title VII protection to sexual orientation, but may hold off on trans issue.
So, with all of this in mind, I'm now saying 5-4 on allowing Title VII protections to sexual orientation discrimination. I predict 5-4 decision denying the trans extension, saying that needs to be done by Congress, not the court. I then predict that a lot of the congress critters that threatened the court on the gun issue with shout about the trans issue, and why we need to change how the court works, and either add another 2-4 justices/shorten the appointments/etc. (I would suggest that these congress critters take a government class and see that it would take an amendment to the Constitution to make these changes, but that's me.)