Midsized trucks can tow/haul what 1/2 ton trucks did a decade or so ago. 1/2 ton tow/haul what a 3/4 ton did.
Which I'm happy about. If you ever use a truck to haul more than a little lumber or groceries or your camping gear, weight in the back adds up fast. The upping of payloads in the F150 is what helped push me into downsizing from my F250. I can actually haul a stinkin' half yard of sand or gravel in my new F150 without going over payload capacity. That wasn't the case with my '02 F150.
On the Bronco, I had an '89. It was a sweet ride with lots of room inside and the chicks digged it (I used to love watching girls in miniskirts work their way up and into the passenger seat
). I do have to say though, and it's only a single data point, it was the only Ford I've ever owned that needed major engine work. It had the 302.
On the Ranger, personally, I think it'll be kind of a bummer if it shows up at Tacoma prices. I think there are a lot of people that want a little pickup as a second vehicle specifically to do "homeowner" type stuff that just requires a bed vs payload capacity. My dad has had a couple of Rangers (currently an '11) that are just regular cab, plain jane rides. Perfect for a short old guy who doesn't want to boost himself into a larger truck (He went from an F250 to the Rangers in his 70's), and just piddles around at his rentals. I think he paid $13K for the current ride.
If the Rangers show up at Tacoma prices, for someone who wants a plain ride, they may be better off looking at an F150 "work truck" that most dealers keep a half dozen of on the lot. I think you can get those for around $20K.
Edit: I forgot to add that when Tacomas were still in the mix when I was looking for a new ride, I do remember seeing a Tacoma "work truck" at a dealer. It was extended cab, 6' bed, 4cyl engine, and had the rear seat delete, which left a ton of room in the back. I think it was like $21K or so.