Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: Balog on August 07, 2011, 01:55:04 PM

Title: Riots in London
Post by: Balog on August 07, 2011, 01:55:04 PM
www.smh.com.au/world/london-burns-as-youths-run-riot-after-shooting-20110807-1ihle.html

Anyone in the UK have insight into this? I wonder how the Brit riot cops handle this. Water cannons, tear gas?
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Scout26 on August 07, 2011, 02:13:08 PM
Appears to be the standard "The man is keeping us down." riiot.

Not sure of the exact circumstances regarding the initial police shooting, but this looks like a protest march that some used as excuse to go looting.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: vaskidmark on August 07, 2011, 03:26:58 PM
Quote
The unrest followed a march to a police station in Tottenham in protest over the shooting death of a minicab passenger by police on Thursday in an apparent exchange of gunfire. Mark Duggan, 29, a father of four, died at the scene.

The radio of a police officer was later found to have a bullet lodged in it.

Darned press screws up the facts, once again.  Everybody knows mere mortals are not allowed to posses handguns in (formerly)Great Britain.  Must have been caught in the crossfire of the circular firing squad the armed police set up.

stay safe.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: agricola on August 07, 2011, 06:01:38 PM
Must have been caught in the crossfire of the circular firing squad the armed police set up.

stay safe.

Ironically enough this is exactly what is being reported now, its unconfirmed but it was apparently a police bullet that was found in the officers radio. 

That apart, this does seem to have been (and increasingly is) a riot that has tacked onto an unconnected protest as an excuse to do some looting, especially the incidents today (when a shopping centre has been turned over some miles away). 
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Balog on August 08, 2011, 09:08:44 AM
Violence spreads, continues for a second night.

 www.channel4.com/news/london-riots-spread
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Iain on August 08, 2011, 04:54:43 PM
Lots more going on tonight. Beck will see this as a prophecy of London burning (that was actually stated as fact at a time of other, completely unrelated student protests that were much more minor and didn't involve much burning, and despite what he was linking them to had nothing to do with immigration or Islam) being fulfilled.

Shops on fire, and lots of people saying there is little police action. Spread to Birmingham tonight as well. It's the product of various things, but if the circular emails the papers were picking up today are genuine, it's more to do with opportunistic looting and vandalism than anything else.

edit, it's still limited in area

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg148.imageshack.us%2Fimg148%2F2075%2Fboroughmap2.gif&hash=9e058b810e0946966744ea6923057c2fdb8ae481)
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: zxcvbob on August 08, 2011, 08:16:31 PM
Shops on fire, and lots of people saying there is little police action. Spread to Birmingham tonight as well. It's the product of various things, but if the circular emails the papers were picking up today are genuine, it's more to do with opportunistic looting and vandalism than anything else.
That's why there is little police action; they are protecting the criminal class.  (professional courtesy.)
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Balog on August 08, 2011, 09:19:34 PM
That's not good... from the Telegraph coverage...

Quote
02 .03 A enormous blaze has engulfed
Sainsbury' s depot in Waltham Abbey, Essex. The
warehousing appears to be the size of a football
pitch and the entire store is ablaze and pouring
thick black smoke. It is one of the major food
depots for central London.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Balog on August 09, 2011, 02:33:29 AM
Appears to have been the worst day yet. Reports of cops sent out sans riot gear, riots being spread outside of London with Twitter co ordination, but thankfully I haven't seen many casualties mentioned. I wonder what will happen tonight?
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Iain on August 09, 2011, 04:16:26 AM
Meeting of COBR this morning. Things got a lot worse after I posted here last night, spread to Liverpool and Bristol too to my knowledge. No reports of deaths that I've heard, but a man has life threatening head injuries according to the BBC. Goes against my inherent socially liberal views, but law and order needs to be re-established hard and fast, right now these people think they are untouchable. According to a guy on the news just now, we haven't used troops on the streets since 1919, and that was because the police were on strike rather than due to the police not coping with something.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: agricola on August 09, 2011, 08:21:41 AM
Meeting of COBR this morning. Things got a lot worse after I posted here last night, spread to Liverpool and Bristol too to my knowledge. No reports of deaths that I've heard, but a man has life threatening head injuries according to the BBC. Goes against my inherent socially liberal views, but law and order needs to be re-established hard and fast, right now these people think they are untouchable. According to a guy on the news just now, we haven't used troops on the streets since 1919, and that was because the police were on strike rather than due to the police not coping with something.

That bloke died.  Yesterday was madness, a series of ever more disgusting acts of criminality with the mood enlivened only by one or two incidents - the probably most interesting to people here being the action of a group of turkish shop owners and their family / friends who armed themselves and saw off a 100-strong mob of would-be looters in Hackney.

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.guim.co.uk%2Fsys-images%2FMedia%2FColumnists%2FColumnists%2F2011%2F8%2F9%2F1312890815971%2FLondon-Croydon-riot-iconi-007.jpg&hash=9b8b338e6f27711ba27062e754c7715bd55767b2)

That picture above was from central Croydon, where there were a series of fires started in business premises which (like many in London) have residential flats above, and people had to jump for their lives to escape.  There were several such incidents across the borough.

Not sure its the right moment for comedy, but:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkWtMNBgf48&feature=player_embedded

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Ron on August 09, 2011, 08:31:19 AM
What did they arm themselves with?

I live in Illinois, 20 minutes outside Chicago city limits, if something like this were to occur here there would be a heavily armed response by my neighbors I suspect.

This might be one of the most anti gun places in the USA on paper but the amount of firepower owned is very substantial.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Iain on August 09, 2011, 08:59:01 AM
2x4's I'd expect Ron.

Lots more police on the streets tonight, Cameron says 16,000. Coppers doing 30hr shifts, poor sods.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: agricola on August 09, 2011, 09:11:07 AM
What did they arm themselves with?

I live in Illinois, 20 minutes outside Chicago city limits, if something like this were to occur here there would be a heavily armed response by my neighbors I suspect.

This might be one of the most anti gun places in the USA on paper but the amount of firepower owned is very substantial.

Bats and pieces of wood, and one imagines the odd knife was present as well.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MicroBalrog on August 09, 2011, 09:33:25 AM
Was not agricola a peace officer in Britain?

I would like to wish him (and Iain too) to stay safe. It doesn't SEEM all uberviolent to me, but regardless. Stay safe, comrades.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: mtnbkr on August 09, 2011, 09:40:34 AM
I just had a conference call with some coworkers in the UK canceled because some of them had to evacuate to safer locations.

Chris
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Iain on August 09, 2011, 09:51:26 AM
A few London forumites on my other board are going home, due to various reports of places that are being targeted later. Boris Johnson (London Mayor and national celebrity) given a torrid time by the public on the streets a few minutes ago "Why are you here now? Too late."

I'm miles away from anything at the moment, though half expect the riots to shift away from London once police forces from around the country have sent officers to London. The nearest riots in Birmingham seemed to be mostly looting, rather than arson and violence.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: kgbsquirrel on August 09, 2011, 12:35:36 PM
That bloke died.  Yesterday was madness, a series of ever more disgusting acts of criminality with the mood enlivened only by one or two incidents - the probably most interesting to people here being the action of a group of turkish shop owners and their family / friends who armed themselves and saw off a 100-strong mob of would-be looters in Hackney.

Reminds me of the Korean shop owners during the 1992 L.A. riots.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 09, 2011, 12:49:19 PM
See, the noble spirit of the Arab spring is spreading!


Not sure its the right moment for comedy, but:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkWtMNBgf48&feature=player_embedded

 :facepalm:

So he's trying to hit police with the umbrella pole?

I found this one more amusing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPi2vEiMARY
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on August 09, 2011, 12:53:36 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SHKhvVjLIc


too bad the cane isn't a 12 gauge
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Balog on August 09, 2011, 07:15:31 PM
Some thoughts on the cause of the riots. http://winstonsmith33.blogspot.com/2011/08/riots-in-london-are-culmination-of.html
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: lee n. field on August 09, 2011, 07:20:01 PM
See, the noble spirit of the Arab spring is spreading!


Mmmmm.

When's it come here, to the good old United State?
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Iain on August 09, 2011, 07:21:42 PM
Some thoughts on the cause of the riots. http://winstonsmith33.blogspot.com/2011/08/riots-in-london-are-culmination-of.html


As ever the argument will be between that viewpoint, and the argument that these kids are the fruits of Thatcher's social policies.

London quieter tonight, more trouble in Manchester.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Ned Hamford on August 09, 2011, 09:02:50 PM
(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FYqsJx.jpg&hash=ce2b48a5185196b6a906b89997df4be0fc0be8ce)
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Tuco on August 09, 2011, 10:13:38 PM
Not sure its the right moment for comedy, but:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkWtMNBgf48&feature=player_embedded

No guts, no glory.

The hooligans are loose, the hooligans are loose!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZnEpaSOFwk&feature=related
What if they become ruffians?
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Azrael256 on August 09, 2011, 10:19:54 PM
Quote
I wonder how the Brit riot cops handle this.

Strong language, mostly.  They're threatening beanbag rounds (or some other equally pointless "less lethal" toy), and if that doesn't work, they'll try the strong language again.

Sorry to our British bretheren, but your country has degenerated to the point that the only people with enough sense to defend themselves are evidently not British.

Ten good marksmen could end this in about an hour.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 10, 2011, 12:04:51 AM

Mmmmm.

When's it come here, to the good old United State?

We already had the American Spring, back in '09. It's interesting to contrast the reaction of the press and the Dem. party to the popular uprisings in the Mid-East, vs. their reaction to our popular uprising here.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MicroBalrog on August 10, 2011, 12:16:37 AM
We already had the American Spring, back in '09. It's interesting to contrast the reaction of the press and the Dem. party to the popular uprisings in the Mid-East, vs. their reaction to our popular uprising here.

Oh come. It was in no way radical enough.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Angel Eyes on August 10, 2011, 01:41:40 AM
This might prove useful:

http://www.londonrioters.co.uk/

People are uploading photos of rioters, asking the public to identify them.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: KD5NRH on August 10, 2011, 01:47:34 AM
Ten good marksmen could end this in about an hour.

Two.  And the only reason I'd put the second one on is so they could cover approaches to each other's positions.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Boomhauer on August 10, 2011, 01:53:38 AM
Quote
I wonder how the Brit riot cops handle this.

By not doing a damn thing*

*And not because they want to do nothing, as the brit popo on the streets apparently wants to smack the ever-loving *expletive deleted* out of some rioters, but their brass will throw them under the bus and the policemen will be prosecuted for harming rioters.



Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 10, 2011, 02:09:47 AM
Oh come. It was in no way radical enough.

I'm not sure what you meant to say.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MicroBalrog on August 10, 2011, 03:15:20 AM
I'm not sure what you meant to say.

I meant precisely what I meant.

A true popular uprising on 'our' side, to succeed, must have, at the least, the following:

1. The comprehension that it is not enough to protect the status quo from some future reforms. The current status quo must be understood as an oppressive and evil one before it can be overthrown.

2. The willingness to take political and personal risks - not through political violence, of course, but through long-term protests and even 'louder' techniques like civil disobedience, one-man picket watches, etc. etc.

In short, what we need is revolutionaries, just right-wing ones.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Iain on August 10, 2011, 04:38:56 AM
This might prove useful:

http://www.londonrioters.co.uk/

People are uploading photos of rioters, asking the public to identify them.


Yep, and the police are doing exactly the same thing with images from those apparently useless 500,000 CCTV cameras.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MicroBalrog on August 10, 2011, 06:08:29 AM
They enable police to be better historians, then?
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: 230RN on August 10, 2011, 06:25:41 AM
Damning truth from Azrael256:


Quote
Sorry to our British bretheren, but your country has degenerated to the point that the only people with enough sense to defend themselves are evidently not British.

........

"Violence only begets violence."

Damning truth from Jeff Cooper:

Quote

I certainly hope so.


Terry, 230RN

REF (actual quote):

"One bleeding-heart type asked me in a recent interview if I did not agree that 'violence begets violence.' I told him that it is my earnest endeavor to see that it does. I would like very much to ensure — and in some cases I have — that any man who offers violence to his fellow citizen begets a whole lot more in return than he can enjoy."

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/quotations-of-jeff-cooper



Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Balog on August 10, 2011, 08:28:52 AM
After four straight days of rioting the Brits have finally approved... using a water cannon. :rolleyes: Way to get tough!
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: agricola on August 10, 2011, 08:47:09 AM
After four straight days of rioting the Brits have finally approved... using a water cannon. :rolleyes: Way to get tough!

Ignore Cameron, Miliband, May and the rest of the fools. 

TBH the most positive thing coming from this is how people are not waiting for the police to protect their community, but doing it themselves... and despite what Azrael claims, its people from every community.  There were sizeable groups that I know of in Enfield, Eltham, Croydon, Southall and Hackney last night, probably more in other parts of London, and it helped to prevent a repeat of Monday.  There were groups in Birmingham and Liverpool as well, sadly three men from Birmingham were killed after - it seems - a car was deliberately driven at them whilst they were protecting shops. 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-14471405




Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: brimic on August 10, 2011, 09:01:00 AM
Interesting. 7 of the 10 top sporting goods sales items from Amazon-UK could are or could be considered weapons.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/movers-and-shakers/sports/#zg_learnMore

Baseball must be getting really popular across the pond.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: 230RN on August 10, 2011, 09:23:48 AM
I wonder when the shopkeepers will discover the elegance and beauty of potato guns?

Say, will a baseball fit inside a schedule 80 3" PVC pipe?

agricola remarked:

Quote
and despite what Azrael claims, its people from every community.

I think Azrael was referring to the specific early mention of the Turkish groups.  It may have become more commonplace since then, but I'm not going to argue the point. 


Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: HankB on August 10, 2011, 11:15:25 AM
I read in another source that American baseball has become incredibly popular over the past few days, judging by the sale of bats . . .  ;)

One rioting female looter, when asked why she was doing that, screamed back words to the effect that she "was getting her taxes back."

At least one Brit blogger asserts a strong racial component to the riots - which doesn't really come through in the footage I've seen:  http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/katharinebirbalsingh/100099830/these-riots-were-about-race-why-ignore-the-fact/

As for the reported lack of response by Brit authorities . . . I'm reminded of an interview with a man who went through "The Troubles" in Northern Ireland a couple of decades ago. When the incidence of home invasions began spiking up, the local police first asked, then demanded that the few people licensed to own shotguns turn them in to the police for safekeeping . . . not out of fear that they'd be stolen, but out of concern that the homeowner might turn it against a home invader.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 10, 2011, 12:02:44 PM
I meant precisely what I meant.

A true popular uprising on 'our' side, to succeed, must have, at the least, the following:

1. The comprehension that it is not enough to protect the status quo from some future reforms. The current status quo must be understood as an oppressive and evil one before it can be overthrown.

2. The willingness to take political and personal risks - not through political violence, of course, but through long-term protests and even 'louder' techniques like civil disobedience, one-man picket watches, etc. etc.

In short, what we need is revolutionaries, just right-wing ones.

I thought you might have meant that the Tea Party was not radical enough to make the comparison between it and the Arab Spring. What you actually meant doesn't seem to relate to what I said. I said there was a popular uprising in the spring of '09. I didn't say anything about how radical it was, or claim that it was the Glorious Revolution that will set our country back on the right path.  ???
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: AJ Dual on August 10, 2011, 01:47:12 PM
At least one Brit blogger asserts a strong racial component to the riots - which doesn't really come through in the footage I've seen:  http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/katharinebirbalsingh/100099830/these-riots-were-about-race-why-ignore-the-fact/

Considering that Caribbean and African Blacks are roughly 2% of the UK's population, but seem to be represented at about 25-50% of the photos I've been looking at, I'd say there's something to the supposition.

I suspect that as it goes on there's been more and more opportunistic rioters/looters from a wider swath of the UK's population though.

The catalyzing event does seem to be displeasure over a shootout between the police and a black criminal though.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MechAg94 on August 10, 2011, 01:51:15 PM
Quote
One rioting female looter, when asked why she was doing that, screamed back words to the effect that she "was getting her taxes back."
Somehow I doubt that rioter pays taxes or that she at least already gets back more than she pays.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Sergeant Bob on August 10, 2011, 02:05:50 PM
After four straight days of rioting the Brits have finally approved... using a water cannon. :rolleyes: Way to get tough!

I certainly hope those water pistols are registered! [ar15]
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MicroBalrog on August 10, 2011, 03:04:50 PM
Quote
I thought you might have meant that the Tea Party was not radical enough to make the comparison between it and the Arab Spring.

That is also true, of course. The Arab Spring was (is, the protests in Egypt and the fighting in Syria is still ongoing) is aimed to completely change the system of government in these countries.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: AJ Dual on August 10, 2011, 03:46:29 PM
That is also true, of course. The Arab Spring was (is, the protests in Egypt and the fighting in Syria is still ongoing) is aimed to completely change the system of government in these countries.

A somewhat nebulous standard, but in the minds of the powers that be here in the U.S., namely the democrats, I'm sure they feel the Tea Party is trying to do just that.  =)
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Angel Eyes on August 10, 2011, 03:49:28 PM
Interesting. 7 of the 10 top sporting goods sales items from Amazon-UK could are or could be considered weapons.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/movers-and-shakers/sports/#zg_learnMore


The shovel is a nice touch, even if it isn't genuine Spetznaz.

Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: gunsmith on August 10, 2011, 04:37:45 PM
Beck will see this as a prophecy of London burning (that was actually stated as fact at a time of other, completely unrelated student protests that were much more minor and didn't involve much burning, and despite what he was linking them to had nothing to do with immigration or Islam) being fulfilled.

I didn't know there was a grandfather from the west Indies named Beck, what a coincidence! Wow this grandfather from the west Indies says this riot is an uprising just like in the middle east

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biJgILxGK0o
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: gunsmith on August 10, 2011, 04:46:40 PM
I didn't know there was a grandfather from the west Indies named Beck, what a coincidence! Wow this grandfather from the west Indies says this riot is an uprising just like in the middle east

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biJgILxGK0o

While I can no longer get Beck because he's only on the net by subscription, I watched enough of his shows to know he doesn't "say" anything most of the time - what he will do is show the radlibs saying things like they are organizing an uprising in the middle east, he would show the radlibs announcing their plans on their own websites and encouraged his viewers to watch Al Jazeera to look up the communist & islamist websites and read it for them selves.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: gunsmith on August 10, 2011, 05:00:13 PM
the news reports I read last night suggested that the dead drug dealer didn't have a gun - that it was a cop who shot at him and the other cops thought the dealer was shooting, FUBAR'ed.

I knew a lot of young brits on the dole in the 90's when I lived in Ireland, welfare is a lot different over there you can save up enough to buy a house if you work off the books ( like everyone does ) take vacations, travel to other countries ... They were very
entitled ( to say the least ) freaking spoiled rotten. Its one of the reasons I really want to close every American mil base overseas, let them pay for their own defense-by us paying for it we prop up their welfare state when we have true unfortunates dying of inanity & deprivation right here
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Iain on August 10, 2011, 05:15:10 PM
gunsmith - he linked students rioting over tuition fees in London to the Arab Spring movement. Completely unrelated, but apparently Europe was on fire. Amusing that you'd cite the old warhorse Darcus Howe on anything really.

It's fun being here at the moment, the politicians are all blaming each other. There's a bit of wailing and gnashing of teeth about social conditions or the abolition of corporal punishment, depends a bit on which politicians you are blaming as to which side you pick there. Next week it will mostly have been forgotten.

The kids had no agenda, they did it because they could. Every city in every country in the world could experience that on any given day, the mob can temporarily rule. I'm very wary of people trying to draw far reaching conclusions about the state of society. This has happened before, Britain is a lot less riot-y than it used to be. It's summer, there was a minor flashpoint in Tottenham and copycats who saw others getting away with it. The police will have to figure out what to do about small, well organised groups who hit and run in future. That's probably about all that will come out of it.

Libya, the Irish and the French are all analysing it in great detail, making grand conclusions. You guys might as well join in too, hell, we do it to you and it'll probably amuse me.

gunsmith - he did have a gun. It wasn't fired, but if he so much as put a hand on it most cops would put at least two rounds in him. Truth will out there.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on August 10, 2011, 05:17:53 PM
his own friends acknowledge that "he was into something"
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: lee n. field on August 10, 2011, 05:32:38 PM
Quote
when we have true unfortunates dying of inanity

??
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 10, 2011, 05:55:04 PM
Quote
The catalyzing event does seem to be displeasure over a shootout between the police and a black criminal father of four, though.

FTFY  :lol:
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: zxcvbob on August 10, 2011, 06:03:50 PM
true unfortunates dying of inanity
That's gotta be a horrible way to go.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MicroBalrog on August 10, 2011, 06:05:26 PM
Every city in every country in the world could experience that on any given day, the mob can temporarily rule.

Do you feel yourself on the verge of flipping out and looting a store, only restrained, perhaps, by your fear of the Bobby?

I certainly don't.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Iain on August 10, 2011, 06:19:28 PM
Do you feel yourself on the verge of flipping out and looting a store, only restrained, perhaps, by your fear of the Bobby?

I certainly don't.

You deny the existence of the mob? It's not made up of me, I wouldn't be there. Everywhere, there are people who would, particularly people who would take advantage of looting. There's nothing unusual about London or Manchester, nothing that couldn't happen in Jerusalem, New York or Beijing. In the latter though, they're a bit more likely to get run over by tanks.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MicroBalrog on August 10, 2011, 07:24:38 PM
I think that the threat of the mob is grossly overstated.

There's a certain amount of people who will do that, no doubt. They're in a minority anywhere, Jerusalem or London.

I think there is a need to separate two things:

1. The social reasons for this event (Thatcherite policies, Cameron's cuts, the welfare state, capitalism, etc. etc.). On these there can be differences of opinion.

2. The tools to deal with this event as it has occured. These have been worked out by civilization already. Guns, police batons, and water hoses. Use them often and in an organized and determined fashion and it will be the non-problem it really is.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Matthew Carberry on August 10, 2011, 07:48:10 PM
2. The tools to deal with this event as it has occured. These have been worked out by civilization already. Guns, police batons, and water hoses. Use them often and in an organized and determined fashion and it will be the non-problem it really is.

You left off tear gas.

In my day it wasn't a riot til the snot ran in rivers.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: gunsmith on August 10, 2011, 10:48:50 PM
That's gotta be a horrible way to go.
quite an inane way to go, I meant insanity.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: gunsmith on August 10, 2011, 11:07:21 PM
gunsmith - he linked students rioting over tuition fees in London to the Arab Spring movement. Completely unrelated, but apparently Europe was on fire. Amusing that you'd cite the old warhorse Darcus Howe on anything really.
No, you're wrong. the students rioting over the tuition fees much like the idiots protesting here identify with the Arab spring. If you look at any radlib protest you'll find folks spouting the usual crud about Palestine, Israel etc , I've been to plenty of protest. I was an anarchist punk rocker when I was young. As an adult I've been a counter protester & I would see all the usual suspects. The same folks that organized tuition fee protest are the very same that organize 90% of all big protest. Here they call themselves ANWSER http://www.answercoalition.org/national/index.html
but really they're most likely "workers world" & a few other of the abc radlib orgs...I put the Darcus Howe guy up there because he was saying that the uprising in the middle east is the same as the riots in London-so its not Glenn Beck saying that, Glenn Beck just shows his viewers people like Darcus Howe saying that.

Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: zxcvbob on August 10, 2011, 11:12:27 PM
quite an inane way to go, I meant insanity.
I like "inane" better ;)  My imagination can run with it.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: roo_ster on August 10, 2011, 11:25:59 PM
You left off tear gas.

In my day it wasn't a riot til the snot ran in rivers.

I think I might cry...for joy.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Hawkmoon on August 10, 2011, 11:32:09 PM
The kids had no agenda, they did it because they could. Every city in every country in the world could experience that on any given day, the mob can temporarily rule. I'm very wary of people trying to draw far reaching conclusions about the state of society.

But it IS a commentary on the state of society -- but perhaps not on the state of politics. The same thing happened (on a smaller scale) a few days ago at the Wisconsin State Fair -- mobs of "youths" began attacking fair-goers. I can't find it now but the reports I saw at the time indicated that the attackers were blacks and that they were singling out whites to assault.

Regrettably, as if we needed proof that technology is always a two-edged weapon, we're going to be seeing a lot more of such "incidents" as the economy continues to erode and more "youths" latch onto orgainizing these events through the "social media."
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Strings on August 11, 2011, 12:56:44 AM
>In my day it wasn't a riot til the snot ran in rivers.<

Wait... there were RIVERS of you????

>:D
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Jim147 on August 11, 2011, 01:16:21 AM
>In my day it wasn't a riot til the snot ran in rivers.<

Wait... there were RIVERS of you????

>:D

River?

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi776.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fyy50%2Fjdavis147%2Fsummerglau20.jpg&hash=345347dba3af3b9639a945fb09ed4cf1742e8930)

jim
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Iapetus on August 11, 2011, 03:40:16 AM
Considering that Caribbean and African Blacks are roughly 2% of the UK's population, but seem to be represented at about 25-50% of the photos I've been looking at, I'd say there's something to the supposition.

I suspect that as it goes on there's been more and more opportunistic rioters/looters from a wider swath of the UK's population though.

The catalyzing event does seem to be displeasure over a shootout between the police and a black criminal though.

On the other hand, most of that 2% is concentrated in London and the other big cities.  About 25-50% of the people I've seen lamenting what has happened and criticising the police for not coming down harder on the riots are also black.

And there was one white rioter interviewed briefly on the news yesterday who say "we have to riot" because "the Poles are taking all the jobs".  (When asked how looting and burning down shops would help, he just said "that's for them to solve").  Fortunately, he was stupid enough to admit to rioting on national TV without wearing any sort of mask, so with luck the police will be paying him a visit before long.


Edited to add: also, the Telegraph article is wrong on at least one point.  The police originally claimed that Mark Duggan fired on them, hitting one officer, before they returned fire.  Now they have admitted that he didn't shoot, and the hit policeman was struck by a police bullet.  The last I heard was that they found a concealed handgun (wrapped up in a sock) inside the taxi, but it had not been drawn.  Now that could be true, and maybe the police could see him trying to draw it, but given the police's record of shooting people for "being on the subway while foreign", or "being in posession of an unlicensed chair leg", and then BSing about what happened, I'd cautious about believeing even that.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Iain on August 11, 2011, 04:37:46 AM
Gunsmith - there's no link, other than that there was a social media aspect, which is what people are saying. Whatever you think of the motives of the Arab Spring movements, people have grievances and they organised in a certain way. Here, people had desires to loot, and they organised in that same way. Student tuition - again, whether you agree with their motives or not, I'm somewhat sympathetic to a generation of children who've been told that in the main their education is going to cost them 20-30x more than mine did, and a lot more than the free tuition that the members of this government, and the last one, got. Particularly when those who got free uni tuition and now charging for it include Eton educated David Cameron, privately educated Tony Blair (started under last government) and most of the cabinet went to Oxford or Cambridge with no tuition, something that will now cost £9,000p/a. Those politicians have also devalued a university education by massively expanding Higher Education to try and get up to 50% of school leavers into university, a ploy intended to reduce youth unemployment statistics.

But, I also happen to think that the country can't afford it any more, and that the concept of back pay tuition fees to people who have benefited over the last 40 years should have been explored. These kids have been told that the old argument that paying back through tuition through taxes now isn't valid for them, but it is and was for everyone born before 1979/80. There's a lot there for the youth to get annoyed about in the ways they always have done, without it being some grand Islamist/Marxist co-conspiracy.

Hawkmoon - my suspicion over people drawing conclusions on this is twofold. One - an axe to grind 'the welfare state did it', 'me first society did it' when we actually have no particular clue right now, and it seems those being arrested include people from professional jobs. Two - everyone will rush to a diagnosis, and it's forgotten about next week. Oh and thirdly, and I'm being careful how I say this, because it doesn't apply to anything said here - there is no small amount of racist commentary going on too. As Iapetus points out, relatively poor young urban blacks living in most of the areas hit constitute a fair higher percentage of the demographic than they do in the rest of the UK. I watched the video gunsmith put up of Darcus Howe, and then watched the comments streaming in underneath it. Depressing is not the word.

Iapetus - I saw that chap too - "gotta do it, there's all these Poles coming over and taking our jobs". Same as it ever was, with less monkey and Paki "jokes".
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: agricola on August 11, 2011, 08:27:15 AM
Edited to add: also, the Telegraph article is wrong on at least one point.  The police originally claimed that Mark Duggan fired on them, hitting one officer, before they returned fire.  Now they have admitted that he didn't shoot, and the hit policeman was struck by a police bullet.  The last I heard was that they found a concealed handgun (wrapped up in a sock) inside the taxi, but it had not been drawn.  Now that could be true, and maybe the police could see him trying to draw it, but given the police's record of shooting people for "being on the subway while foreign", or "being in posession of an unlicensed chair leg", and then BSing about what happened, I'd cautious about believeing even that.

With respect, the Police have never claimed that.  If you look at the official statements that were put out, none of them state that, it was papers sexing up the much blander statements of the IPCC and Met (admittedly possibly with the benefit of individual officers spinning them a line off the record). 
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Jocassee on August 11, 2011, 09:28:55 AM
I'm very wary of people trying to draw far reaching conclusions about the state of society.


I understand what you mean completely.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Bogie on August 11, 2011, 01:40:56 PM
1) People are angry. They may not know completely why, but they are angry.
 
2) People in large numbers are stupid. Take the collective IQ, and for a small group, take 10% off of it... For a bigger group, take 25% off... Add loud noises, a bit of booze, and the opportunity of getting a free big-screen TV that you can tuck under your arm and walk home with, and you can cut 50%...
 
US cities are going to come unhinged if welfare is cut.
 
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: gunsmith on August 11, 2011, 03:31:20 PM
Gunsmith - there's no link, other than that there was a social media aspect, which is what people are saying. Whatever you think of the motives of the Arab Spring movements, people have grievances and they organised in a certain way. Here, people had desires to loot, and they organised in that same way. Student tuition - again, whether you agree with their motives or not, I'm somewhat sympathetic to a generation of children who've been told that in the main their education is going to cost them 20-30x more than mine did, and a lot more than the free tuition that the members of this government, and the last one, got. Particularly when those who got free uni tuition and now charging for it include Eton educated David Cameron, privately educated Tony Blair (started under last government) and most of the cabinet went to Oxford or Cambridge with no tuition, something that will now cost £9,000p/a. Those politicians have also devalued a university education by massively expanding Higher Education to try and get up to 50% of school leavers into university, a ploy intended to reduce youth unemployment statistics.

But, I also happen to think that the country can't afford it any more, and that the concept of back pay tuition fees to people who have benefited over the last 40 years should have been explored. These kids have been told that the old argument that paying back through tuition through taxes now isn't valid for them, but it is and was for everyone born before 1979/80. There's a lot there for the youth to get annoyed about in the ways they always have done, without it being some grand Islamist/Marxist co-conspiracy.

Hawkmoon - my suspicion over people drawing conclusions on this is twofold. One - an axe to grind 'the welfare state did it', 'me first society did it' when we actually have no particular clue right now, and it seems those being arrested include people from professional jobs. Two - everyone will rush to a diagnosis, and it's forgotten about next week. Oh and thirdly, and I'm being careful how I say this, because it doesn't apply to anything said here - there is no small amount of racist commentary going on too. As Iapetus points out, relatively poor young urban blacks living in most of the areas hit constitute a fair higher percentage of the demographic than they do in the rest of the UK. I watched the video gunsmith put up of Darcus Howe, and then watched the comments streaming in underneath it. Depressing is not the word.

Iapetus - I saw that chap too - "gotta do it, there's all these Poles coming over and taking our jobs". Same as it ever was, with less monkey and Paki "jokes".

So, when English Socialist claim that they are organizing in the middle east, & then they claim they are organizing protest against tuition fee's they are simply blowing smoke? Sure they use facebook/twitter but who doesn't? They seem to be a bit better at using social media then the conservatives do but that doesn't mean they are not organizing protest here & in the UK & the middle east, look at the "peace flotilla" that's a hodgepodge of the usual suspects, ANSWER,Code Pink, & all the various ABCD "revolutionary groups"
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: 230RN on August 12, 2011, 11:50:22 AM
Bogie said,

Quote
2) People in large numbers are stupid. Take the collective IQ, and for a small group, take 10% off of it... For a bigger group, take 25% off... Add loud noises, a bit of booze, and the opportunity of getting a free big-screen TV that you can tuck under your arm and walk home with, and you can cut 50%...

You are merely "popularizing" the long-standing Terry's Law of Reciprocity of Group Intelligence, to wit:

"The reciprocal of total group intelligence is the sum of the reciprocals of each individual's intelligence."

That is,

1 / Total Intelligence  = 1 / Intelligence 1 + 1 / Intelligence 2 + 1 / Intelligence 3 + 1 / Intelligence N...

This is similar to the law of Resistors in parallel:

1 / Total Resistance  = 1 / Resistance 1 + 1 / Resistance 2 + 1 / Resistance 3 + 1 / Resistance N...

Just as Total Resistance decreases as the number of paths for the current to flow increases, Total Intelligence decreases as the number of paths for stupidity to flow increases.

And the same corollaries apply:

(1)  Total Resistance (Intelligence) cannot be greater than the smallest Resistance (Intelligence).

(2)   As any Resistance (Intelligence), regardless of value, is added, the Total Resistance (Intelligence) must decrease.

(3)  As any Resistance (Intelligence) is added, the total Power possible increases.

Et cetera... consult any electrical handbook.

Note that for only two Intelligences, the equation can be simplified to the "product over the sum" formula *, that is,

Total Resistance =  (Resistance 1 X Resistance 2) / (Resistance 1 + Resistance 2)

and similarly, for Intelligence,

Total Intelligence =  (Intelligence 1 X Intelligence 2) / (Intelligence 1 + Intelligence 2)

This rubric also explains a lot of what goes on with various internet boards.

Respectfully submitted,

Terry, 230RN

* REF:
http://www.tpub.com/content/armyordnance/Od16338/Od163380090.htm
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: gunsmith on August 14, 2011, 03:20:53 AM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/2010/nov/10/demo-2010-student-protests-live

left wing UK newspaper says "anarchist/socialist" protesting tuition hikes, I wonder how Glenn Beck got them to say this??

And here too http://www.swp.org.uk/
Glenn Beck is forcing the socialist workers party UK to organize both protest over police racism during the riots and also in support of Egyptian/Arab spring.

Who knew how powerful Glenn Beck is, he makes the commies unite with the islamofascist - he is forcing them to work together! how evil is he?
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MicroBalrog on August 14, 2011, 06:35:11 AM
Supporters of Arab Spring protests are islamofascist?
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: birdman on August 14, 2011, 08:18:01 AM
The whole tuition thing bothers me, even here.  Tuition has increased far faster than inflation, and the root cause is greater governmental financial assistance, by enabling individuals to pay more, at the same "cost" to themselves, colleges have been relatively free to raise prices--which begins the endless cycle of "college is too expensive-->increased financial aid-->increased tuition-->college is too expensive"

In a freer market, colleges could compete to offer the greatest ROI--which they did up until 10-20 years ago.  The very most expensive colleges were the ones that had, statistically the highest post-graduate salaries (the good Ivy's, MIT, Caltech, etc)...now with tuition inflation, small liberal arts schools have shot up, while yielding effectively the same post-grad return, leaving many in a pit of debt, and the rest of the country picking up the tab...for instance, since when did Pell grants start being for middle class? (50% go to those significantly above the poverty line)...simple, when it became a way to buy baby boomer votes by financing their kids.

Simple example: MIT was 25-30k/yr back in the 90's, and mean starting salary was 50-60k for graduates...now it's 45k ish, and mean starting is 75k. (mean starting = 1.5x annual cost)

There are liberal arts colleges that have similar 40-45k costs...do you think their graduates earn a mean of 75k plus with a BS/BA?

This whole "everyone should go to college" push, and the denigration of for-profit schools and certificate programs has resulted in increased resources spent on those who are going to take advantage of it, an over-credentialed society, and a lack of workers in non-degree but high salary fields (technical services, e.g. Electricians, welders, machinists, etc).  We all got lost on the way and turned "someone should be able to find a way to go to college, if that's what they want and it's the right decision" to "everyone goes to college".   One strategy I was proud of being a part of was MIT's "guaranteed need" program--if you got in, they made sure you can go by calculating what you can afford, and making up the shortfall between the cost and your input (plus any fed programs you qualified for) with MIT money--in effect, when I went, half the students paid for the other half--it's the only way I was able to go (we had little money when I was growing up).  By doing it themselves, they staked their finances on students being able to earn enough to make it worthwhile, as half were paying the whole stake, and if it wasn't worth it, they would lose that half.  And it worked...those of us who had the need were (in my experience and observing others) the ones who worked the hardest--we knew what the burden was (on our folks, ourselves, and other students) and maximized the return.

Contrast this to students on major fed aid, at uber-expensive liberal arts schools--where 4 yrs is not even the standard time to earn a degree anymore!  Why leave? Someone else is paying!

The extended college time with someone else footing the bill merely extends adolescence and postpones productivity. 

Read "hard America, soft America", the author contrasts 50's through 90's American youth/post college aduts with European equivalents (as they have had more of a welfare state for longer)...I have a feeling the good things he cites about America are disappearing, and the tuition escalation/long adolesence is a big factor.  His basic thesis is that in America we coddle our you, but then throw them into the real world post-college (quote from friends after Monica cuts up Rachels credit cards "welcome to the real world, it sucks...you are gonna love it"), thus creating hard post-college adults...in Europe, primary/secondary school is usually harder than in the US, but then they are thrown into a welfare state--creating softer post-university adults.  I fear that may be over.

The friends quite is telling...compare TV depictions of 20's folks now to 10 years ago...now it's extended adolescence...then the characters had money problems, and to work, find jobs, etc.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: gunsmith on August 14, 2011, 02:56:29 PM
Supporters of Arab Spring protests are islamofascist?

yup! I'm surprised you didn't get the memo! :cool: :P

BTW, I'm a little curious how you got from me saying that islamofascist & commies work together to mean Arab spring supporters are islamofascist?

I remember protesting the Shah in NYC in 1979, we anarchist were protesting in favor of the student rebels & against the Shah & a few months later  the ayatollah steam rolls over the naive young protesters & implements islamofascism ... That's what happens when naive young radlibs support the islamofascist against the common enemy.

The radlibs believe they are smarter then everyone & in their zeal to destroy the western way of life & implement their workers paradise they would hand the reigns of power to the islamofascist who ( despite their belief in post stone age violent monotheism ) are actually the ones using the radlibs and are probably smarter and definitely more cunning then the radlibs.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MicroBalrog on August 14, 2011, 03:08:42 PM
yup! I'm surprised you didn't get the memo! :cool: :P

Are you trolling?
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: gunsmith on August 14, 2011, 03:10:36 PM
Are you trolling?

Are you??
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: seeker_two on August 14, 2011, 07:45:38 PM
The extended college time with someone else footing the bill merely extends adolescence and postpones productivity. 

I think you're on to something here...it would definitley explain how colleges get away with mandating so many courses that have nothing to do with post-graduate marketable skills. If you got rid of most of these classes, college would be affordable for most everyone who wants it....and more valuable in the marketplace than it is now....

Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: vaskidmark on August 15, 2011, 08:47:25 AM
I think you're on to something here...it would definitley explain how colleges get away with mandating so many courses that have nothing to do with post-graduate marketable skills. If you got rid of most of these classes, college would be affordable for most everyone who wants it....and more valuable in the marketplace than it is now....



You are aware that you havve just cited the general reason for extending the mandatory education laws to where they kept kids in school beyond what is now about the 6th or 7th grade, aren't you.  Keeps kiddies out of the labor pool for a few more years, as well as "permanently" filtering out that group that cannot achieve diploma/graduation status.

IIRC the Brits used a system that split into 2 tracks somewhere about that point - the ultra-high-achievers got tracked to get prepped for college, the high-achievers got tracked to get prepped to be secretaries/ store clerks and the like, and the rest were sent to be apprenticed to the trades.  There are days (usually the ones ending with the letter "Y") when I think reviving that system might be better than not reviving it.

stay safe.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MicroBalrog on August 15, 2011, 08:48:59 AM
Explain this thing about British education to me. Are you talking about the A-Level/O-Level examination system or something else?
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: 230RN on August 15, 2011, 09:14:42 AM
birdman observed:

Quote
Tuition has increased far faster than inflation, and the root cause is greater governmental financial assistance, by enabling individuals to pay more, at the same "cost" to themselves, colleges have been relatively free to raise prices--which begins the endless cycle of "college is too expensive-->increased financial aid-->increased tuition-->college is too expensive"

This cycle seems to be fairly common and is exemplified by car insurance and medical insurance escalating prices/costs.

I wonder if someone can formulate a general "law" to this effect, starting from the idea that the highest price for a commodity is "that which the market will bear," and adding that to the idea that price is a function of demand and supply.  Except that price is artificially inflated by external supplies of money for the commodity...

I guess I'm still a little wooly-headed about it, but I can "see" a functional relationship emerging from that external supply of money influencing the price.

Maybe I just need more coffee this AM.


Terry, 230RN
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Iain on August 15, 2011, 10:53:34 AM
Explain this thing about British education to me. Are you talking about the A-Level/O-Level examination system or something else?

He's talking about the 11 plus, which streamed into grammar schools (traditional book learning) and secondary moderns (more emphasis on practical skills etc). Introduced near the end of the war, it was supposed to be a tripartite system, with technical schools, but they never got built.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: HeroHog on August 15, 2011, 12:10:57 PM
I remember well sitting down with my counselor in High School and having this conversation: Counselor: "Mr. Mercer, you HAVE to take more than just PE and Welding in your Sr. year!" Me: "HAVE to or need to?" Counselor: "You really have to take more than just those classes to round out your education!" Me: "Again, HAVE to or you want me to? Those classes two will fulfill all the legal requirements for my graduation." Counselor: "But... but... you just CAN'T!" Me: "PE and Welding please! Oh, and by the way, please mail me my diploma. I won't be attending graduation as I have a job to go to."

After I got out of the Navy, I went to Louisiana Tech University as a Engineering Major on the GI bill/Disability only taking one 099 math class to get up to speed even though I graduated High School with like a 2.0001 GPA or so (it wasn't good). The VA's tests showed I had the skills and aptitude to major in most anything I desired with a full ride from Uncle Sam.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 15, 2011, 01:03:05 PM
Did you feel consoled?
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: HeroHog on August 15, 2011, 01:08:44 PM
Did you feel consoled?
Spell check alone is just not enough. Sad considering I wound up settling for Technical Writing as my major after I found myself unable to memorize all the carp required to survive Trig and all the math that hinges off of it!
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Balog on August 15, 2011, 01:29:09 PM
So I haven't heard much from London lately, did the water cannon and plastic bullets work? All quiet?
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: vaskidmark on August 15, 2011, 02:42:11 PM
So I haven't heard much from London lately, did the water cannon and plastic bullets work? All quiet?

There's a lot of blending-in going on.  http://iiipercent.blogspot.com/2011/08/got-your-anti-riot-uniform.html

Now available at Wal-Mart or Target for about $10.

BTW, that suggestion about the N-95 mask under the bandana - it will do nothing for teargas.  You're going to have to go to a surplus store and risk getting narc'ed to the FBI for buying a real gas mask.

stay safe.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 15, 2011, 02:53:28 PM
Spell check alone is just not enough. Sad considering I wound up settling for Technical Writing as my major after I found myself unable to memorize all the carp required to survive Trig and all the math that hinges off of it!

I also struggle to remember the different species of carp.  =)
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: AJ Dual on August 15, 2011, 02:56:56 PM
I had heard that the British .gov was going to require the BBC, SKY, and all other outlets to only play "Yackety Sax" to accompany any riot-related video or newscasts.

This is supposed to make people think back to the Benny Hill Show, and "better times" and lift the national mood until the current emergency is over with.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: zxcvbob on August 15, 2011, 04:20:16 PM
I had heard that the British .gov was going to require the BBC, SKY, and all other outlets to only play "Yackety Sax" to accompany any riot-related video or newscasts.


And speed the videos up 50%.  (hey, it could work)
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MicroBalrog on August 15, 2011, 04:28:40 PM
Are you??

No, I'm an islamofascist.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: AJ Dual on August 15, 2011, 04:41:54 PM
No, I'm an islamofascist.

Yeah, those guys just need a better PR agency. The whole sexual inequality thing would actually play well in much of the world if they just went from burquas to bikinis...

They'd have every male under 30 in Western Civ going "Jesus... who?" inside a week.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Strings on August 16, 2011, 01:08:11 AM
Hmmm....

AJ... ever think about creating a religion? I think you're onto something there...
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: Ned Hamford on August 16, 2011, 05:05:52 PM
(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.themis-media.com%2Fmedia%2Fglobal%2Fimages%2Flibrary%2Fderiv%2F66%2F66780.jpg&hash=08428bb474c9d94ac123b7582793c488b1bd668e)

 =D
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: gunsmith on August 17, 2011, 02:35:49 PM
No, I'm an islamofascist.

Quote
BTW, I'm a little curious how you got from me saying that islamofascist & commies work together to mean Arab spring supporters are islamofascist?

I'm still a bit curious about that, I have a friend that was a huge supporter of the Egypt & other protest back February  in & I tried to point out to him that  (just like in 79 when he & I were protesting the Shah) the islamofascist were just going to use the people who were protesting for change and democracy   to usher in the Muslim Brotherhood & islamofascism.  When I pointed this out to him he suddenly had to get real busy rebuilding his shade structure for burningman and reading liberal blogs so he was to busy to reply.

So please, how is that just because I believe that Arab Spring supporters are being used by Islamist that it means I'm saying they are Islamist?
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: MicroBalrog on August 17, 2011, 02:59:28 PM
What you said is:

Quote
Glenn Beck is forcing the socialist workers party UK to organize both protest over police racism during the riots and also in support of Egyptian/Arab spring.

Who knew how powerful Glenn Beck is, he makes the commies unite with the islamofascist - he is forcing them to work together! how evil is he?

"In support of Egyptian/Arab spring" =/= Islamofascist.
Title: Re: Riots in London
Post by: gunsmith on August 17, 2011, 03:30:01 PM
commies are uniting with Muslim brotherhood etc, but that statement of mine does not say that all supporters of Arab spring ARE islamofascist.

The commies are a bit upset with Beck for pointing out that they are willing to collaborate with genocidal homophobic maniacs that are OK with killing their moms and sisters for honor, but that isn't the same as saying everyone who supports change and democracy/Arab spring are  genocidal homophobic maniacs, sorry for not making that clear