Hmm?
$8 per household is an insignificant amount of money. That's rather the point of the article, right, to convince folks that it wouldn't matter if we started using legal workers and paying them reasonable (whatever that means) wages?
$8 per household is 0.006% of GDP, and we can't even measure GDP accurately to within 1%. $8 per household is trivial.
Well, I'm convinced. I see no benefit to making the switch from illegal to legal workers, it wouldn't amount to a hill of beans either way. Nobody would notice the difference.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to weigh in on the immigration debate one way or the other. I just find it funny that most of the anti-immigration rhetoric seems to be focused on how much influence illegals have on everything. Illegals are sending vast amounts of money to families down south, money that should be going to honest hard-working Americans that just want a job. Employers are getting rich on illegal labor, getting rich by not paying fair wages and not paying taxes.
It's all presented as such a big deal, a huge economic impact, making us all poor. It's so big and important that we must do something about it. Now. Or else.
And then here's this article showing that illegals don't have much influence at all in the economics of produce farming, a field where they're most heavily concentrated. Presumably they have even less influence on fields where they're less of a presence.
The inconsistencies are hard to ignore.