I think you're reading way too much into something.
Seriously, human sexuality is a lot more complex than your simplistic paranoia about the gayz taking over the world with Pinky and the Brain style schemes.
I rarely weigh in on things like this, but it seems to me that certain philosphies like to crowd gender into two absoluteley separate categories, when there is a considerable overlap.
I was reading up on this a little in response to something else, and from my admittedly limited research, it appears that a certain proportion of newborns have characteristics of both sexes and a decision has to be made for corrective surgery to go one way or the other.
There is also something called
Kleinfelter's Klinefelter's Syndrome, I found, wherein a certain proportion of males have an extra female chromosome...
Klinefelter syndrome is a condition related to the X and Y chromosomes (the sex chromosomes). People typically have two sex chromosomes in each cell: females have two X chromosomes (46,XX), and males have one X and one Y chromosome (46,XY). Most often, Klinefelter syndrome results from the presence of one extra copy of the X chromosome in each cell (47,XXY). Extra copies of genes on the X chromosome interfere with male sexual development, often preventing the testes from functioning normally and reducing the levels of testosterone. Most people with an extra X chromosome have the features described above, although some have few or no associated signs and symptoms.
http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/klinefelter-syndrome
From what I can gather, the numbers involved are somewhat sketchy, since corrected "intersexed" babies are not publicised, but are kept hidden as a family secret, so to speak, and Kleinfelter's syndrome is likewise often undiagnosed.
However, it is a safe guess that at least 1 in 500 or so people lie somewhere between the extremes of male versus female sexuality and body types.
As far as I can tell from my research thus far, this ain't a matter of "philosophy," it's a matter of medical fact.
I'm not willing to argue knowledgably about all this, I only recently got curious about it.
But it's in line with bluestarlizzard's second paragraph.
Maybe sometimes "men is men and wimmens is wimmens" is not wholly true.
I guess.
Terry, 230RN
Edited to correct spelling of Klinefelter... which shows you how much I know in the first place.