Heh. Oddly, RoadKingLarry (RKL), that's what started my pointless but amusing campaign against excessive acronymizing.
I had to review some Navy specs on a test device. They started out using the full descriptions or names with their ABBRs or ACROs in parentheses. But that was the only time they equated the two, and continued to use the ABBRs and ACROs throughout the remainder of the booklet.
It took approximately three times as long to get the sense of what was being said because, unlike NAVGENIUSES, I could not remember all of them and had to keep going back to look them up.
Now I recognize that in some things, like Morse Code, it is better to ABBR commonly used concepts (e.g., the Q-codes and the 10-codes) because the information rate is pretty slow, but as time went on (the Precipitating Incident (PI) was back in the 90s) it seemed more and more obvious after the PI that ACRO generation was more of a mind game for the participants than a practical necessity.
73s
de T