I bet if the city had just parked cars behind all of the pastors' vehicles, failed to investigate an assault on the pastor, and then hauled him in for questioning during his protest time we'd all be commending Michigan for its canny use of the law to keep the peace.
Surely no one here would seriously consider a free speech regime where the content determines which restraints are valid, right?
You mean if private individuals had parked the cars right?
Cause that would actually be totally different in terms of rule of law.
The differential treatment of the assault shouldn't be allowed, though if the procedures and timelines were average for similar assaults, there's not a lot the police can do if witnesses refuse to testify.
Again, the hauling in for questioning during his planned protest time is problematic (again unless it followed the same procedures always used in similar situations) but since Jones was not time-limited by events (the length of the funeral) it wouldn' have worked regardless. They would have had to used an indefinite detention without cause which is as prima facie unConstitutional as what actually happened to Jones anyway.
Don't you hate it when precision makes zinger generalizations kinda, well, less "zing-ey".