Author Topic: On big guns and mag capacity.  (Read 8337 times)

Fly320s

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,415
  • Formerly, Arthur, King of the Britons
On big guns and mag capacity.
« on: January 10, 2011, 11:16:14 PM »
The discussions regarding the assaults and murders of many people in Arizona lead to this thread: http://www.armedpolitesociety.com/index.php?topic=27711.0  That thread really got me worked up about magazine capacities and the possibilities of another gun/mag/assault rifle ban.  I have to add that I despise the term "assault rifle."  That is like saying "assault tire iron."

In that thread, French G wrote this:
Quote
The 33rd stick is my default choice when I am on the road, want to defend my family, and a rifle is inconvenient.
  The bold highlight is mine. 

My purpose here is to illustrate the simple, basic fact that in a life-or-death situation more is better.  More is better.  Have you ever imagined yourself in a fight for your life?  Or in a fight to save your family's or friend's life?  If you haven't, do so now.  So, to help you imagine this, there you are facing down a crazed pyschopath who's only goal is to kill you so that he can then kill your family.  Given any choice, what would you like to defend yourself with?  Handgun, rifle or shotgun?  Screw those ideas!  I want battalions of highly-trained Navy SEALs, Army Special Forces, and mean-old Marines.  Why should I limit myself to a freaking Glock, even if it does have a 33-round magazine?  Or an AR with a 30-round mag?  The obvious problem is that I can't realistically expect that kind of help in a personal defense situation.  So, I start working down the list of realistic ideas: A company-size group of warriors?  No.  A squad?  No.  Me with the biggest, highest-capacity weapon that I can proficiently wield?  Bingo.  For me, that is an SBR AR15 with a 30-round magazine.  For some, the best option may be a Glock with a 33-round magazine.  Anyone who would dare to restrict access to the best available tool for self defense for an individual has no business as a member of a free society.

Which is pretty much where we stand today.  But, thanks to the morons in Washington, we may be faced once again with even fewer optons.  That Glock with the 33-round magazine might soon become that Glock with the 10-round magazine.  And those oh-so-fun-and-handy ARs might become those oh-so-illegal-ARs.  Some people just don't understand the idea of personal defense and how the 2nd Amendment protects that.  Some people think that because some jackwagon psycho in Arizona kills a bunch of people with a 30+ round magazine that all 30+ round magazines are evil and that the manufacturer should stop selling them right before congress bans them for life.

Listen people, you can not have too much ammo when you are fighting for your life.  Bigger mag capacities means more time shooting and less time reloading.  Less reloading means less chance of you fumbling the magazine or inducing a malfunction.  Everything you can do to reduce your chance of screwing-up adds to your chances of winning the fight. 

No matter what you hear or read about the second amendment and gun control, personal defense is the baseline, the default line, of how we should begin to think about restricting guns.  If you wouldn't willingly restrict your own options for defending yourself or your family, don't even think about trying or allowing restricitons on someone else. 
Islamic sex dolls.  Do they blow themselves up?

AZRedhawk44

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,982
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2011, 11:25:39 PM »
Not me.  If you're not as crotchety close-minded old realistic as I am in self defense expectations, then you don't deserve that stuff.  Everyone who's been there done that knows that all you need to survive any self defense situation is a .38 snub.  Everyone with doublestack wundernines and single stack .45's with cavernous maws of doom at the business end is just wishing they were ninjaswatoperators.

[/cynical mimicry of old fart rant]

That guy down in Tucson is exactly why I carry 18+1, plus a reload.  And frankly makes me think about another reload.  And a BuG that I can toss to another defender.  And a secure radio link to the nearest Marine base.  And a hacked PDA G4 uplink to that new experimental Air Force micro-shuttle all full of God Rods.

Crazy people suck.  Whether they have 33 round Glock mags, or a pen to write legislation.
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner

I reject your authoritah!

Northwoods

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,356
  • Formerly sumpnz
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2011, 11:55:29 PM »
As a general principle I agree 100%.  Personally, my choice has been a 6+1 capacity .45ACP compact pistol for away-from-home protection.  At home, once I figure out a good, reasonably kid-proof set up I'll have a 20ga loaded with buck-shot made handy.

Be nice to have an AR or AK handy at home as well, but as I don't own either of those platforms the pistol and eventual shotgun will have to do for now.
Formerly sumpnz

Fly320s

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,415
  • Formerly, Arthur, King of the Britons
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2011, 11:58:34 PM »
Crazy people suck.  Whether they have 33 round Glock mags, or a pen to write legislation.
Distilled insight.

As a general principle I agree 100%.  Personally, my choice has been a 6+1 capacity .45ACP compact pistol for away-from-home protection.  At home, once I figure out a good, reasonably kid-proof set up I'll have a 20ga loaded with buck-shot made handy.

Be nice to have an AR or AK handy at home as well, but as I don't own either of those platforms the pistol and eventual shotgun will have to do for now.
Compromise is a reality check.
Islamic sex dolls.  Do they blow themselves up?

Strings

  • APS Pimp
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,195
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2011, 12:00:20 AM »
At home, every gun that I know will function properly is loaded, ready to go (no kids to worry about).

Away from home, the standard is an autoloader with 2 reloads (regardless of capacity), just in case of failure. With a Seecamp in pocket...
No Child Should Live In Fear

What was that about a pearl handled revolver and someone from New Orleans again?

Screw it: just autoclave the planet (thanks Birdman)

French G.

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,197
  • ohhh sparkles!
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2011, 12:03:22 AM »
We go several times a year for a week vacation, rent a house and such. If it is to anywhere south of my Virginia home I've taken to stuffing an AR-15 in the trunk with a few spare mags. I usually stuff the spare revolver in between the driver's seat and the console to avoid the impossibility of fishing out a holstered carry piece. I've gotten lax since moving out of the city, I used to think nothing of carry gun, 2 17rd reloads and a BUG. More is better.
AKA Navy Joe   

I'm so contrarian that I didn't respond to the thread.

French G.

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,197
  • ohhh sparkles!
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2011, 12:05:44 AM »
We go several times a year for a week vacation, rent a house and such. If it is to anywhere south of my Virginia home I've taken to stuffing an AR-15 in the trunk with a few spare mags. I usually stuff the spare revolver in between the driver's seat and the console to avoid the impossibility of fishing out a holstered carry piece. I've gotten lax since moving out of the city, I used to think nothing of carry gun, 2 17rd reloads and a BUG. More is better.

Around home I obey rule #1. Usually that means toss the AR-15 in the front seat of the truck with me. I have stooped to taking my 1858 NMA on a quick run to town though. Must be that damn census data lulling me into complacency.
AKA Navy Joe   

I'm so contrarian that I didn't respond to the thread.

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,466
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2011, 12:09:07 AM »
I merely carry a throwing star to deal with multiple assailants and hordes of ninja bear IRS auditors. I am so b-b-b-b-b-bad, it is all I need.
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

red headed stranger

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,263
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2011, 12:28:05 AM »
A Glock 17 with a 33rnd mag, and a Surefire x400 is part of our home defense/repel boarders gear.

Having a gun so equipped without needing to reload as often has some distinct advantages.  It it allows you to shoot one handed in the event that you are carrying your child to saftey or pushing them out of the way. A weapon so equipped also allows you to go longer without a reload and needing use of your second hand.  Additionally, having an effective one handed firearm is desirable in case you have a hand injured. (one of the most common gunfight injuries.) 

I was a single stack and/or j-frame carrying guy for a good while.  After some of the events in my neck of the woods, (Phoenix metro area) I realized that multiple assailants is a very real possibility.  I have since moved to a Glock 17 with a reload and a 33rnd mag in my laptop and/or Diaper bag.   



 
Those who learn from history are doomed to watch others repeat it

KD5NRH

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,926
  • I'm too sexy for you people.
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2011, 12:37:25 AM »
So, to help you imagine this, there you are facing down a crazed pyschopath who's only goal is to kill you so that he can then kill your family.  Given any choice, what would you like to defend yourself with?  Handgun, rifle or shotgun?  Screw those ideas!  I want battalions of highly-trained Navy SEALs, Army Special Forces, and mean-old Marines.

Screw infantry!  I want air and artillery support.

That's a bit unrealistic for home or personal defense, though, so I carry a 5-shot .357 and a couple reloads to get me to the car, where an 18+1 9mm and a couple more reloads for each gun wait, or at home, the closet, where a bigazz 12ga waits next to a pair of battle rifles.

AJ Dual

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,162
  • Shoe Ballistics Inc.
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2011, 12:58:23 AM »
Power armor.

Squish the closest attacker with the left waldo, and flick the leftover giblets at the next one while drilling them all with the PXL focused to 1cm for anti-personnel work. (Pulsed X-ray Laser)

If you leave it focused at 1mm for anti-armor, it'll go through way too many walls.
I promise not to duck.

Monkeyleg

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,589
  • Tattaglia is a pimp.
    • http://www.gunshopfinder.com
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #11 on: January 11, 2011, 01:04:23 AM »
AJ, what are you talking about? A game?

AJ Dual

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,162
  • Shoe Ballistics Inc.
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #12 on: January 11, 2011, 01:07:30 AM »
AJ, what are you talking about? A game?

Sorry, I've said too much.
I promise not to duck.

Strings

  • APS Pimp
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,195
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #13 on: January 11, 2011, 03:25:50 AM »
DUDE! You KNOW we're not supposed to mention that stuff to the civies!
No Child Should Live In Fear

What was that about a pearl handled revolver and someone from New Orleans again?

Screw it: just autoclave the planet (thanks Birdman)

seeker_two

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,922
  • In short, most intelligence is false.
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #14 on: January 11, 2011, 06:01:38 AM »
I wouldn't be surprised if some new gun-control legislation is pushed through despite the new GOP Congress. But I think that the "new gun culture" (or Gun Culture 2.0, as Michael Bane calls them), those who primarily own guns for SD, will make any politician who supports new gun-control legislation pay a steep price at the polls. And, with Heller and McDonald, such laws will be swiftly challenged and tied up for at least a decade.....

Gonna be a bumpy ride ahead for everyone....
Impressed yet befogged, they grasped at his vivid leading phrases, seeing only their surface meaning, and missing the deeper current of his thought.

red headed stranger

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,263
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #15 on: January 11, 2011, 06:10:33 AM »
I wouldn't be surprised if some new gun-control legislation is pushed through despite the new GOP Congress. But I think that the "new gun culture" (or Gun Culture 2.0, as Michael Bane calls them), those who primarily own guns for SD, will make any politician who supports new gun-control legislation pay a steep price at the polls. And, with Heller and McDonald, such laws will be swiftly challenged and tied up for at least a decade.....

Gonna be a bumpy ride ahead for everyone....

I'd like to think that the new makeup of the congress will work in our favor this time.  BUT, i have some niggling concerns that Boehner might want to make some kind of deal that gets rid of Obamacare in exchange form some "reasonable" concessions where guns are concerned. 
Those who learn from history are doomed to watch others repeat it

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2011, 08:06:32 AM »
This is why I don't get why many mouse guns don't have higher cap mags available.  If I'm carrying my little gun, and I empty the first mag, I don't want 7 round back up mags.  I want 10+ rounders. 
I'm actually thinking about getting some 10 rounders for my 1911.  Same thing, if I empty it, I don't care to only put 8 more in.
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

Harold Tuttle

  • Professor Chromedome
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,069
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #17 on: January 11, 2011, 09:27:31 AM »
FA american 180s FTW
"The true mad scientist does not make public appearances! He does not wear the "Hello, my name is.." badge!
He strikes from below like a viper or on high like a penny dropped from the tallest building around!
He only has one purpose--Do bad things to good people! Mit science! What good is science if no one gets hurt?!"

BridgeRunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,845
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #18 on: January 11, 2011, 09:54:25 AM »
As far as I'm concerned, more secure is better than more.  Kids.  And I've never been accused of being the most organized person around.  I don't carry--didn't want to fill out the app until I got my bar card, and now can't afford it--but when I do, it's gonna be something small, probably in .40 or .45 for daily wear and a tiny .38 for running. 

If a mass-murderer starts shooting at my family, chances are some of us will die.  I've made my peace with that.  Life is dangerous.

AmbulanceDriver

  • Junior Rocketeer
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,933
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #19 on: January 11, 2011, 05:07:27 PM »
My personal EDC is a 1911 w/ 3 8-rd mags total.  8+1 in the gun, and another 16 rds on the belt.  25 rounds total.  Frankly, my plan is to avoid if possible, evade if necessary, then shoot if forced (and run like hell).  That being said, my opinion is that most goblins (unless they are mentally deranged, or VERY highly trained) will turn and run when facing return fire.  Especially if they see one or two of their buddies go down.  Now, that doesn't mean that they won't seek retribution when numbers and surprise are in their favor, but that's a whole different set of tactics.  

That's where the shotgun stoked w/ 00 and slugs comes in, as well as the Garand w/ several bandoleers of reloads.   
Are you a cook, or a RIFLEMAN?  Find out at Appleseed!

http://www.appleseedinfo.org

"For some many people, attempting to process a logical line of thought brings up the blue screen of death." -Blakenzy

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #20 on: January 11, 2011, 05:48:07 PM »
When I was in the service, I did a bunch of training and shot a lot of rounds downrange.

Once, during a trench-clearing live-fire, we were shooting so much, so rapidly (1) folks' hand guards were melting, rounds would cook off in the chamber, and we had one chamber blow out. 

We started off each iteration with, minimum, 210 rounds apiece and most packed more.  It got shot up right quick.  There were several iterations during the day & night.  PM, water, reloading mags between iterations.

I was one of those who carried more than 210 rounds, as I had access to more magazines and didn't mind the weight so much. 

These days, I doubt I'll clear trenches with anything but a spade.  210 rounds is not "a good start" but a number of rounds completely out of the realm of reasonable.

Compromise is a reality check.

I think this is where 320's comment comes in.  Any CCW is a compromise. 

If I had my druthers, I'd pack a shotgun & slugs or a self-loading rifle. 

30+ round mags against some of my old buddies in armor toting M4A1s, SAWs, M240Bs, Gustavs, (all with a full combat load of ammo) & such would not be much more useful than a 1911 and a spare mag or any other CCW you can think of.

When it comes to CCW, we compromise functionality for concealability.  Some want to pack more mass/gear in case they face multiple attackers.  I, too, sometimes pack more gear/weight, but more as failure mitigation.  The extra mag is if the mag in the weapon is faulty.  My ankle or pocket-carry CCW is if my primary doesn't work for some reason.

I did, however, just get a new double mag-holder, so my on-board ammo for my SW1911 will bump from 17 (or 19 if I use my 10-rnd Wilson) to 25 (or 29 if I pack 2 spare 10-rnd Wilsons).






(1) M4A1 & other heavier-bbl M16 variants rated at something like 12-15 rounds/minute in sustained fire
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

Battle Monkey of Zardoz

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,915
  • A more Elegant Monkey for a more civilized Forum.
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #21 on: January 11, 2011, 07:14:12 PM »
Quote
DUDE! You KNOW we're not supposed to mention that stuff to the civies

At least he didn't mention the, ahh well, something to do with orbiting platforms.
“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”

Abraham Lincoln


With the first link the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.

Strings

  • APS Pimp
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,195
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #22 on: January 11, 2011, 07:52:37 PM »
GAAAAAHHHHH!!!

OPSEC PEOPLE, OPSEC!!!
No Child Should Live In Fear

What was that about a pearl handled revolver and someone from New Orleans again?

Screw it: just autoclave the planet (thanks Birdman)

lee n. field

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,605
  • tinpot megalomaniac, Paulbot, hardware goon
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #23 on: January 11, 2011, 07:53:35 PM »
---oops, wrong thread---
In thy presence is fulness of joy.
At thy right hand pleasures for evermore.

Northwoods

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,356
  • Formerly sumpnz
Re: On big guns and mag capacity.
« Reply #24 on: January 12, 2011, 12:54:37 AM »
That being said, my opinion is that most goblins (unless they are mentally deranged, or VERY highly trained) will turn and run when facing return fire.  Especially if they see one or two of their buddies go down. 

Yep, at least in most cases I've ever hear of. 

Had a couple/three hours to chat with Charl vanWike.  He was the guy that shot back at the Marxist terrorists that attacked his church in South Africa right at the end of the apartheid era (St James Massacre for those that want to Google it).  They had AK's (with da-switch), grenades, etc.  There was IIRC 5 of them, plus a getaway driver or two.  Charl was the only parishoner that was armed.  All he had was a 5-shot snub nose .38.  Didn't even have a re-load.  Terrorists ran screaming like little girls when he shot back.
Formerly sumpnz