Author Topic: New developments at Yellowstone - Harmonic Tremors? (Merged Threads)  (Read 50524 times)

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Quote
YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, Wyo. — The University of Utah's seismograph stations reported a swarm of small earthquakes in Yellowstone National Park.

The university said the quakes of magnitude 3.5 and lower have been occurring beneath Yellowstone Lake, five to nine miles south-southeast of Fishing Bridge, a park landmark. The earthquakes that began on Friday and continued on Saturday intensified during the weekend, and there were reports that people in the Yellowstone Lake area felt the quakes.

The University of Utah says they've been in an area of the park where quake swarms are common.

That's in the caldera.

As long as they don't start getting steady, rhythmic seismicity, the harmonic tremors thing...



Quote
2.5  2008/12/28 22:30:04 44.507N 110.371W  0.8   61 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.2  2008/12/28 22:23:37 44.511N 110.369W  1.2   61 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 1.9  2008/12/28 21:29:18 44.522N 110.385W  1.0   59 km (37 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.9  2008/12/28 21:25:54 44.504N 110.364W  0.6   61 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.2  2008/12/28 16:57:57 44.509N 110.372W  0.9   61 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.0  2008/12/28 16:08:25 44.491N 110.390W  1.7   60 km (37 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 3.2  2008/12/28 12:55:17 44.499N 110.350W  0.4   63 km (39 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.6  2008/12/28 12:32:15 44.511N 110.352W  0.3   62 km (39 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.4  2008/12/28 08:37:41 44.523N 110.370W  0.4   60 km (37 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 3.2  2008/12/28 02:23:57 44.511N 110.361W  0.4   61 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.2  2008/12/28 00:15:19 44.487N 110.358W  0.4   62 km (39 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.1  2008/12/27 23:37:20 44.491N 110.383W  0.2   60 km (37 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.4  2008/12/27 22:23:54 44.490N 110.360W  1.9   62 km (39 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 3.8  2008/12/27 22:15:56 44.492N 110.365W  0.2   62 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.6  2008/12/27 17:08:50 44.493N 110.354W  0.4   62 km (39 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 3.3  2008/12/27 15:30:03 44.498N 110.358W  4.3   62 km (39 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 1.5  2008/12/27 15:28:53 44.500N 110.368W  2.1   61 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 1.8  2008/12/27 15:27:36 44.499N 110.367W  2.5   61 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.1  2008/12/27 14:08:49 44.496N 110.370W  2.0   61 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 3.2  2008/12/27 13:26:27 44.505N 110.364W  2.4   61 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 3.5  2008/12/27 13:17:33 44.488N 110.357W  4.1   62 km (39 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.3  2008/12/27 11:56:35 44.484N 110.367W  0.5   62 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.8  2008/12/27 11:23:07 44.490N 110.369W  0.1   61 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.5  2008/12/27 10:01:07 44.484N 110.367W  0.2   62 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
 2.6  2008/12/27 09:30:53 44.497N 110.368W  0.4   61 km (38 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT
« Last Edit: January 01, 2009, 03:52:43 PM by Gewehr98 »

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2008, 12:56:19 PM »
Somehow it will be called Bush's fault.

Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

41magsnub

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,579
  • Don't make me assume my ultimate form!
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2008, 01:16:50 PM »
Global warming is causing it.

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2008, 01:18:43 PM »
Global warming is causing it.

Well. It'd definitely cause global cooling.


Nick1911

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,492
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #4 on: December 29, 2008, 01:22:46 PM »
Another excuse to buy cheap/stack deep.  Particularly in respect to canned food products...

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2008, 01:26:59 PM »
Another excuse to buy cheap/stack deep.  Particularly in respect to canned food products...

Well. I'm not sure how much good that would do. If that ever went, it'd pretty much just blow up America, and cover whatever was left with several feet of ash. And then make the world dark. It would sort of suck.

It is basically a reason to have a offworld colony, for survival of the species.

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #6 on: December 29, 2008, 01:30:07 PM »
I live about 60-100 miles from the Eastern edge of both ash dumps.

Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

Standing Wolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,978
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #7 on: December 29, 2008, 01:40:05 PM »
Quote
Global warming is causing it.

Well, yeah, but Bush caused global warming. Everything is going to be different as of January 20, 2009.
No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #8 on: December 29, 2008, 01:49:43 PM »
Well, yeah, but Bush caused global warming. Everything is going to be different as of January 20, 2009.

Maybe the Siberian Traps will blow up that day.

Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

Declaration Day

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,409
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #9 on: December 29, 2008, 02:00:14 PM »

gunsmith

  • I forgot to get vaccinated!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,183
  • I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #10 on: December 29, 2008, 02:31:31 PM »
naaaah, if Yellowstone blew it would only affect Idaho, Wyo, Ore, Montana,
eastern NV , Utah , Colo, maybe the west part of the Dakota's.

Nothing to worry about, NY and CA will still be there.

Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Rocket Man: "The need for booster shots for the immunized has always been based on the science.  Political science, not medical science."

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #11 on: December 29, 2008, 02:33:14 PM »


Nothing to worry about, NY and CA will still be there.



To save us all with higher taxes

Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

Mabs2

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,979
  • セクシー
    • iCarly
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #12 on: December 29, 2008, 02:35:21 PM »
It's either the Elder Gods or giant three legged space ships.
At least we'd have a chance against the aliens.
Quote from: jamisjockey
Sunday it felt a little better, but it was quite irritated from me rubbing it.
Quote from: Mike Irwin
If you watch any of the really early episodes of the Porter Waggoner show she was in (1967) it's very clear that he was well endowed.
Quote from: Ben
Just wanted to give a forum thumbs up to Dick.

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #13 on: December 29, 2008, 02:59:42 PM »
Apparently, the last eruption was 875000 megatons.

That could cause hearing damage.

crt360

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,206
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #14 on: December 29, 2008, 04:01:11 PM »
I'm glad I went to Yellowstone a few times when I was younger (before anyone thought about it blowing up).  It doesn't look quite as appealing now.
For entertainment purposes only.

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #15 on: December 29, 2008, 04:35:13 PM »
Well, I'm likely within the nearly immediate kill zone  =|

(about 150 miles away)
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2008, 04:40:41 PM »
The map above is updating. Up to 41, now, more today.

mfree

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,637
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #17 on: December 29, 2008, 04:43:42 PM »
In one little spot?

Huh. That'd make you think something'd going on, wouldn't it.

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #18 on: December 29, 2008, 05:03:21 PM »
In one little spot?

Huh. That'd make you think something'd going on, wouldn't it.

49 now, and I personally would not be on that lake right now. They're less than a kilometer down. I would be quite worrying about a bubble of gas.

gunsmith

  • I forgot to get vaccinated!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,183
  • I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #19 on: December 29, 2008, 06:36:02 PM »
seriously though, I remember hearing or watching a tv show or something that if yellowstone blew it could
be pretty bad
Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Rocket Man: "The need for booster shots for the immunized has always been based on the science.  Political science, not medical science."

Regolith

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,171
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #20 on: December 29, 2008, 07:06:15 PM »
seriously though, I remember hearing or watching a tv show or something that if yellowstone blew it could
be pretty bad

Yeah.  Super volcanoes are not very good for your health.


Last one exploded around 75,000 years ago, about the same time genetic researchers believe a bottleneck (i.e. mass die-off with only a few tens of thousands survivors) occurred in the human race.

Let's put it this way....if Yellowstone goes off, I don't think I'd want to be on the same continent.  Being on the same planet probably wouldn't be all that great either, though if you aren't in regions that will experience heavy ash-fall it's likely you will survive (though times will be tough for the next couple of years).
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. - Thomas Jefferson

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. - William Pitt the Younger

Perfectly symmetrical violence never solved anything. - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth

BridgeRunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,845
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #21 on: December 29, 2008, 07:11:12 PM »
It is basically a reason to have a offworld colony, for survival of the species.

Personally, I don't give a **** about the species, I care about me and mine.  Other than that, hey, whatever.

RocketMan

  • Mad Rocket Scientist
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,635
  • Semper Fidelis
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #22 on: December 29, 2008, 07:59:34 PM »
"After faulting the Bush administration for refusing to "open a reasonable dialogue" with the volcano 'Goddess of Fire' Pele, President-elect Obama said today he is cutting short his Hawaiian vacation to open direct negotiations with the diety over the matter of the recent earthquake activity in Yellowstone Park."
If there really was intelligent life on other planets, we'd be sending them foreign aid.

Conservatives see George Orwell's "1984" as a cautionary tale.  Progressives view it as a "how to" manual.

My wife often says to me, "You are evil and must be destroyed." She may be right.

Liberals believe one should never let reason, logic and facts get in the way of a good emotional argument.

Cromlech

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,402
  • English bloke
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #23 on: December 29, 2008, 08:44:24 PM »
I remember a TV special about this a few years back, it's pretty scary stuff. It is of course one of those things that we have absolutely no power over. Unless we can get Bruce Willis and his drilling team on the job.
When in deadly danger, when beset by doubt, run in little circles, wave your arms and shout!

Parker Dean

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 405
Re: Yellowstone...uh-oh?
« Reply #24 on: December 29, 2008, 09:17:58 PM »
Seems like it's been a while since any significant eruption anywhere, doesn't it?