CAnnoneer,
Lest you misunderstand, that's actually my position. It's a logical fallacy to assume any physical data can prove or disprove a non-physical belief using the scientific method.
Faith and divinity is a far bigger thing than can be encompassed in something so small as a mere infinity of created time and space.
When you flip over to internal logic for Christianity, you start with the mandatory assumption that G-d is who He said He is and that, in fact, as created beings there are things we cannot understand about a raft of faith-based beliefs. If you start saying "well this seems evil to me, so G-d isn't who He says He is", by definition you are no longer talking about the Christian G-d and might as well be talking about Superman. It helps that I don't view the Bible as a "science text" or a strict "history". That stuffs in there, but the Bible is all about the relationship between G-d and man, which has nothing to do with this world except in passing.
There's no conflict between science and my faith because I start with the presumption that my faith isn't dependent on this created, temporary world (all the important stuff will happen after I'm dead). I enjoy studying science to better understand my "home for my lifetime" and figure if something doesn't seem to mesh there's a divine explanation I'll get soon enough. For the present I can just take it at face value as the best explanation the human mind is capable of and leave it at that. It has nothing to do with salvation or my relationship with the Creator of everything.
