Author Topic: Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants  (Read 3845 times)

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« on: September 07, 2006, 09:34:06 PM »
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants

By JAMIE STENGLE
Associated Press

DALLAS  A Dallas man has had it with baggy pants that overexpose, so he wants the City Council to look into a ban on wearing the oversized trousers that often slip so low as to show underwear.

Ron Price, a Dallas school board member, has asked the City Council to look at strengthening the law to give citations to those who expose their underwear.

I think its disrespectful, its dishonorable and its disgusting, said Price, who made the recommendation last week to the City Council. I have no problem with the top of your Hanes label being shown. My problem is when grown men walk about the city with pants below their buttocks.

Council members have asked the city attorney to look into the issue. City Attorney Tom Perkins said this week hes investigating the legalities and will report back to the council.

But experts say that such a law might not hold up, so to speak.

It would be too vague, said Robert Jarvis, constitutional law professor at Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. He said that for a criminal law to be constitutional, a person of average intelligence must know whats being prohibited.
*

 

Whos to say how baggy pants can be before theyre baggy pants, he said. Theres just no way to regulate these things.

Some Dallas City Council members are raising concerns about police attention being diverted to fashion instead of crime.

It doesnt make a lot of sense to me that we are discussing banning baggy pants  we have important crime and public safety issues to be concerned with, said council member Angela Hunt.

Council member Gary Griffith said he does not favor taking policemen and women off patrol to track down and chase young people on how theyre dressing. Thats not the right use of our police force.

Such proposals havent made it too far in recent years. In Virginia, the Senate dropped a bill last year the would have fined those with pants so low their underwear was exposed. A similar bill from a Louisiana state representative failed to pass in 2004. And such proposals havent faired well at the city level either.

This is one of those areas where the legal battles have been fought, and we know what the answer is, Jarvis said.

Lisa Graybill, legal director ACLU of Texas, called such a ban a distraction.

Its certainly difficult for me to imagine that it would stand up, she said.

Price said the underwear issue came up after he took some elderly women to dinner and a group of men walked by with their pants so low their underwear was on display

I just feel that its so disrespectful to our senior citizens, especially to women..., he said.

He said that in the Dallas school district, most schools require students to wear uniforms and students also must wear belts and tuck in their shirts.

In the city its a different deal, he said. Im asking the city to do something about it. If the city decides law enforcement, so be it.

School districts have a fairly wide discretion to set dress codes, said Naomi Gittins, staff attorney at the National School Boards Association.

For school districts, a dress code rule must be somehow related to the education mission. For instance, a district could show that in their area baggy pants are associated with gang membership and ban such apparel, she said.

Baggy, drooping pants got their fashion start with hip hop music, and then mainstream designers started producing them, said Mary Ruppert, assistant professor of fashion at Stephens College in Columbia, Mo.

A recent trip to a North Dallas mall showed lots of super baggy pants, but they were paired with long T-shirts so no underwear was evident.

Trip Dalrymple, 18, of Dallas, wore extremely loose pants, but his shirt was also very long. He said that if someones look includes showing their underwear, its just a matter of style, not something that should be banned.

Besides, he said, he wouldnt want to get fined if his pants slipped.

Kendall Beck, 26, of Dallas, was wearing low pants, but his shirt was also long and tucked in. He said that he agreed with the proposal that people should be fined for showing their underwear.

Youve got to be presentable, he said. Besides, showing underwear with super baggy pants is a look thats played out, he said.

Ruppert, for one, agrees.

She said the current fashion pendulum is swinging heavily in another direction this fall: super skinny pants for both men and women.

It is a radical jump this season, very thin leggings, Ruppert said.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

Maser

  • friend
  • New Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 67
    • The Teen Guns Forum
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2006, 09:49:55 PM »
And to think I used to like Texas.
Why must life be so hard? Why must I cry? Why must I be so wrong? Why must I die?

spinr

  • Guest
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2006, 09:53:15 PM »
I'd like the Dallas City Council to look into banning Mr. Price for being an asshat...

Frakkin' ridiculous.

Nightfall

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 916
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2006, 11:16:05 PM »
Nothing says "land of the free" like government dictating to private citizens what constitutes acceptable fashion sense. Awesome.
It is difficult if not impossible to reason a person out of a position they did not reason themselves into. - 230RN

LAK

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2006, 12:47:43 AM »
No law necessary - just a return to civilized culture. A good start might be to spread the word among young people exactly wear this "fashion" originated.

---------------------------------------------------

http://ussliberty.org
http://ssunitedstates.org

280plus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,131
  • Ever get that sinking feeling?
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2006, 01:57:29 AM »
They already know and that's what makes it "cool". rolleyes

Yup,,, Ban Asshats!

LOL...
Avoid cliches like the plague!

LAK

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2006, 02:48:32 AM »
Actually, most of them, when they find out it is prison "best boy" don't find it very "cool" - and start wearing a belt Wink

------------------------------------------

http://ussliberty.org
http://ssunitedstates.org

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,456
  • My prepositions are on/in
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2006, 03:01:52 AM »
Belts would help a lot of people, not just the hip-hoppers.  Speaking of hip-hoppers, though, I did see a young, hip dude crossing the street the other day, with his pants hanging so low, I could see the HEM of his under-drawers.  Not the waistband, the HEM, for crying out loud.  


Quote from: Nightfall
Nothing says "land of the free" like government dictating to private citizens what constitutes acceptable fashion sense. Awesome.
Fashion sense?  No, it's about respecting others.  Pants hanging down under the posterior should fall under the purview of indecent exposure/public nudity laws.  Why not?  Why must I bear someone else's nudity or near nudity forced on me, male or female?
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

Antibubba

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,836
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2006, 03:50:23 AM »
So, could a legal case of successfully defending the height of my waistline be considered plausible denimability?

Wink
If life gives you melons, you may be dyslexic.

Leatherneck

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,028
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2006, 09:09:39 AM »
Teenagers have a God-given right to walk around looking like idiots. Always have, always will.

TC
TC
RT Refugee

lupinus

  • Southern Mod Trimutive Emeritus
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9,178
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2006, 09:10:51 AM »
I'm just tired of seeing little hearts everytime I want down the street
That is all. *expletive deleted*ck you all, eat *expletive deleted*it, and die in a fire. I have considered writing here a long parting section dedicated to each poster, but I have decided, at length, against it. *expletive deleted*ck you all and Hail Satan.

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #11 on: September 08, 2006, 09:11:20 AM »
better to see underwear than plumber's crack

-C
Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

Nightfall

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 916
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #12 on: September 08, 2006, 09:20:48 AM »
Quote from: fistful
Fashion sense?  No, it's about respecting others.  Pants hanging down under the posterior should fall under the purview of indecent exposure/public nudity laws.  Why not?  Why must I bear someone else's nudity or near nudity forced on me, male or female?
Ah yes, one of the Lost Amendments:

"The right of the people not to absorb light with their retinas, reflected from a source they dislike, shall not be infringed."

You don't have to bear nudity. Cover your eyes, and using a seeing eye dog to get around in public. Your problem with their appearance is exactly that - your problem. I don't like piercings. I really don't want to see them. But guess what? That's my problem. You seem to be confusing a personal hangup with something other people have to tailor their lives to.
It is difficult if not impossible to reason a person out of a position they did not reason themselves into. - 230RN

Car Knocker

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 192
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #13 on: September 08, 2006, 09:20:53 AM »
Well, I have to admit that a ban on "plumber's butt" has a certain appeal.  Used to work with a guy who's nickname was "The Crack".

Going to be hard to write a law that doesn't also scoop up Grandpa and his baggies.  Then there's the young women who wear low-rise jeans that also, on occasion, reveal a glimpse of underwear in the back.  Then they have to exclude toddlers - lots of baggy exposure there.

Not going to be easy.
Don

280plus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,131
  • Ever get that sinking feeling?
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #14 on: September 08, 2006, 11:14:21 AM »
Quote
Then they have to exclude toddlers - lots of baggy exposure there.
BAN DROOPY DRAWERS!!
Avoid cliches like the plague!

Guest

  • Guest
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #15 on: September 08, 2006, 02:09:37 PM »
Every single generation of young people in the history of mankind has been looked upon with horror by a bunch of irrelevant old men who feel their control on the world slipping through their fingers. Its nice that technology and a new concept of legislation allows them to shake their fist without having to buy a rocking and chair and sit on their porch. The march of progress is working hard to make sure that everything stays exactly the same in a more effecient manner than ever before.

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,456
  • My prepositions are on/in
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2006, 10:32:26 PM »
Quote from: Nightfall
You don't have to bear nudity. Cover your eyes, and using a seeing eye dog to get around in public. Your problem with their appearance is exactly that - your problem. I don't like piercings. I really don't want to see them. But guess what? That's my problem. You seem to be confusing a personal hangup with something other people have to tailor their lives to.
It's not about my hang-up at all.  It's about a minimum level of civility that we can all agree on, like not showing our posteriors in public.  It's very sad that we now think a nation can exist as millions of isolated people having no agreement on anything.  Can't happen, unless you want me to stay at home and dominate APS all day long.  You don't want that, do you?


Quote from: Car Knocker
Going to be hard to write a law that doesn't also scoop up Grandpa and his baggies.  Then there's the young women who wear low-rise jeans that also, on occasion, reveal a glimpse of underwear in the back.  Then they have to exclude toddlers - lots of baggy exposure there.
Please.  Firstly, I thought the guy who started all of this said in the article that he "didn't mind the waistband showing," or some such thing. So, the "glimpse of underwear" wouldn't be an issue, although it perhaps should be.  I won't correct you on the toddler issue, though, you know that's ridiculous.
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #17 on: September 08, 2006, 10:51:53 PM »
Let us postulate something silly.

Let's suppose I have a pair of reallly long underpants (maybe they even look like shorts).

Suppose I wear them in public. This would apprently be okay under this legislation - but not wearing jeans that would expose these underpants.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

American By Blood

  • New Member
  • Posts: 10
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #18 on: September 08, 2006, 11:58:44 PM »
Quote from: MicroBalrog
Let us postulate something silly.

Let's suppose I have a pair of reallly long underpants (maybe they even look like shorts).

Suppose I wear them in public. This would apprently be okay under this legislation - but not wearing jeans that would expose these underpants.
Ban boxers in public?  Shoot... I'd never get the paper in the morning then...

I kid, I kid.
"What we have we hold--No surrender!"

Nightfall

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 916
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #19 on: September 09, 2006, 08:05:30 AM »
Quote from: fistful
It's not about my hang-up at all.  It's about a minimum level of civility that we can all agree on, like not showing our posteriors in public.
Actually, I would say it is your hang-up. While you can find people who agree with your assessment that showing boxers is uncivil, I too can find a bunch of people who think it doesn't amount to anything. Now, I'm not saying we can't or don't have general agreements on what constitutes civility. However, I am saying that armed gov't officials enforcing a law is a poor way to go about "civility" in a free society. Social pressure is the preferred method for that, IMNSHO.
Quote
It's very sad that we now think a nation can exist as millions of isolated people having no agreement on anything.  Can't happen, unless you want me to stay at home and dominate APS all day long.  You don't want that, do you?
We can agree on plenty of stuff. We can live our lives accordingly, and pressure others to do the same. That doesn't mean we need to be arresting people because they wear (or don't wear) something we dislike.

As for dominating APS, I assume we're talking post-mass exodus here? :p
It is difficult if not impossible to reason a person out of a position they did not reason themselves into. - 230RN

InfidelSerf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 884
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #20 on: September 09, 2006, 08:37:54 AM »
I was dragged to the mall yesterday (I don't think I've stepped inside one of those things in 12 years) by the GF so she could get an outfit for a party we were invited to.

I spent two hours walking around sheeple watching, and saw more mens boxers in the walkways than in the stores.

While I find it ridiculous and absurd. I find a law against the practice even more absurd.

Personally I would be more infavor of a law giving me the right to smack them upside the head and point them to the mens dept. for a belt.  
If they are not showing their nads... then there really isn't anything one can do about it,legally.

What we can do is ridicule them.. make fun of the behavior and make them generally self conscience about the idiotic display of ignorance.

It's a fad that will go away in time.  Laws stay on the books nearly indefinately.
The hour is fast approaching,on which the Honor&Success of this army,and the safety of our bleeding Country depend.Remember~Soldiers,that you are Freemen,fighting for the blessings of Liberty-that slavery will be your portion,and that of your posterity,if you do not acquit yourselves like men.GW8/76

Car Knocker

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 192
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #21 on: September 09, 2006, 11:46:38 AM »
Quote from: fistful
Please.  Firstly, I thought the guy who started all of this said in the article that he "didn't mind the waistband showing," or some such thing. So, the "glimpse of underwear" wouldn't be an issue, although it perhaps should be.  I won't correct you on the toddler issue, though, you know that's ridiculous.
These examples illustrate my concern over the difficulty of writing a law or ordinance that doesn't overreach the original intent when applied zealously.  For example, I seem to recall someone being arrested under the child pornography laws for taking photos of their toddlers cavorting in the nude - I believe the parents were turned in by the photo lab.
Don

gunsmith

  • I forgot to get vaccinated!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,185
  • I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #22 on: September 09, 2006, 12:57:37 PM »
in a way it's kind of like the swicthblade and nunchucka ban in most places.
those laws are still on the books and teen hoods now carry guns into schools
so the switchblade law is injury to folks who need a tool like that.
Chucks being banned is stupis too, because kids in the 70's emulated
Bruce Lee a rather excellent weapon is a felony
in many places.........

but those droopy pants are so silly looking.
it looks like they didn't make it to the bathroom and
dropped a load
Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Rocket Man: "The need for booster shots for the immunized has always been based on the science.  Political science, not medical science."

Antibubba

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,836
Dallas official wants city ban on baggy pants
« Reply #23 on: September 09, 2006, 06:34:43 PM »
If it will cause a young hoodlum to possibly trip and fall whilst running from a misdeed, I am all for it.

Just as I prefer they get their shooting lessons from music videos, instead of Frontsight.
If life gives you melons, you may be dyslexic.