Stark raving *expletive deleted*ing mad.
Even the South Korean president is pushing the idea that Trump should be considered for the prize.
So, WJLA in Washington, DC, had a viewer poll yesterday asking if Trump should be considered for the Nobel prize if something fruitful comes out of the Korean talks.
As can be expected, only 17% of the people polled thought he should be considered. Some of the no comments were pretty indicative of the "He could cure cancer, end poverty and hunger, and make everyone wealthy and he still wouldn't deserve any credit for anything ever because he's a Nazi!"
The whole while I'm thinking... Donald Trump has done more for world peace in a year's time in office than Barak Obama did for his no time in office, and guess who has a Nobel prize?
Looking at the list of Americans who have won the Peace Prize it's pretty evident that the committees going all the way back can only think in terms of lef-focused social progressivisim as being worthy of being considered for a Peace prize.
Case in point -- Mikhail Gorbachev was awarded the Nobel Peace prize in 1990 for... ""for his leading role in the peace process which today characterizes important parts of the international community..."
From what I can tell, Ronald Reagan's part in that process wasn't even remotely considered.