He's been busy removing from power an aggressive, violently anti-American, mass-murdering, terroristic dictator who possessed WMD.
Wait. you mean we took out Kim Il Jung?!?! Wait, we didn't? Who are you talking about? As far as I've heard, he toppled the Taliban and "liberated the iraqi people"... maybe I missed the part about possessing WMD's...
atek3
I'm talking about Saddam, but you already knew that.
I get tired of repeating it, but it seems some people still haven't caught on. So, once again:
Saddam developped WMD. Saddam possessed WMD. Saddam used WMD. Saddam agreed to desroy his WMD in full view of the world. He neither destroyed his WMD nor allowed the world to watch over his weapons stockpiles and development programs.
Oh yeah, he was also a mass-murdering terrorist who hated the US with a passion. He sounds like just the kind of (mad)man who might gas Manhattan or LA. Fortunately, he'll never have the chance
But... but... "Saddam didn't have WMD when we invaded, therefore he never had WMD in the past." Yeah, I've heard that line, too. Don't bother repeating it to me. It's an argument that doesn't hold water. We KNOW that Saddam had WMD, because he used them to kill some 5,000 of his own people.
The question is not "Did Saddam have WMD?" We know the answer to that.
The real question is "Where are Saddam's WMD now?"