Evolution seems simple enough to me. I don't see a need to add an infinitely complex deity to the equation. Though you're free to, if you like.
Infinitely complex?
Sir Fred Hoyle, a popular agnostic who wrote Evolution from Space (1981), proposed that such odds were one chance in 10 to the forty thousandth power("the same as the probability that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard could assemble a 747").
Francis Crick, an atheist and co-discoverer of the "DNA structure" in 1953, calls life "almost a miracle." 5 He couldn't rationalize the metaphysical implications of his DNA discovery so he devised his "interstellar spores" theory in the 1970s.
By the way, scientists from various disciplines generally set their "Impossibility Standard" at one chance in 10 to the fiftieth power (1 in a 100,000 billion, billion, billion, billion, billion). Therefore, whether one chance in 10 - 100,000,000,000 or one chance in 10 - 40,, the notion that life somehow rose from non-life has clearly met the scientific standard for statistical impossibility.
In other words, the theory of these simple enzymes forming on their own is 800 times more unlikely than the scientific standard of impossibility!Since then, Hoyle's claims have been refuted as
wildly optimistic. Any living creature is many times more complex than a simple 747. The human eye alone dwarfs the complexity of a 747, which increases the impossibility by a power of tens of thousands.
Evolution is FAR more complex and takes FAR more faith to believe than Creation.
Look around at the world and it's complexity's. Ask yourself, which takes more faith? In the beginning an all powerful God with intelligent design created this? Or in the beginning dirt, with an unexplained power and force and with NO intelligence created the world?
