OK, finally reading the linked article in the OP. It is only funny or interesting if one misconstrues the themes and gets the factual bits as wrong as the article's author
I hope it was satire. Were it otherwise, it would be a fine example of spergitarian damnfoolery.
==================
1. The author gets it wrong off the bat. Bailey Building and Loan is a co-op. Those taking loans are also investors & so forth. It _is_ being run for the benefit of the investors and those who hold a majority of the shares. Pretty much guts the argument from the get-go.
2. Potter's slum manager speaks of the numbers of folks leaving Potter's housing and eventually going to work for Bailey.
And so forth.