Maybe, but it'd doubtful they'd be able to identify anybody. They'd have to try to sue the police for not keeping the crowd from throwing stuff at their van.
Ah, but the courts have held that the police are not required to protect anybody in particular . . .
Phelps sues everybody. That's where they get all their money.
Which is why, of course, the premium choice is to merely ignore them...
Phelps sues everybody. That's where they get all their money.
Which is why, of course, the premium choice is to merely ignore them...
That may be satisfactory in the case of some protests. When people are disrupting a funeral, however, "just ignore them" is a callous answer indeed. Such things are not a matter of First Amendment rights.
Those people really test my belief in Constitutional freedoms.
They had their say.
The opposing group had their say.
Isn't that the way the Freedom of Speech is supposed to work?