So the Iraqis wanted us there while Bush was in charge but not after???
The Iraqis have never wanted Ameican troops stationed there. They just weren't capable of forcing us to leave. The expiration of the Status of forces agreement allowed them to get what they always wanted.
The infrastructure and civil society have been decimated by the war. Years of occupation did not rebuild them.
Iraqis have fewer services, more violence, and more sectarian tension today than before the war. Their government will now proceed to cozy up even more closely with Iran.
Is there any light that could cause this to reflect a win?
And, this has to do with Obama's failure to get an agreement to the status of forces .... exactly,
how? DeSelby, you made this point months ago, and I presented concrete evidence that your statement was false. Apparently you're just shooting from the hip once again with this. If that's the case, why should I believe the rest of what you say?
I don't think DeSelby has ever stopped drinking kool aid long enough to figure out there are many other liquids available that provide better nourishment and have fewer nasty after-effects.....
If I'd known there were not going to be any WMDs there when we started the Iraq War I wouldn't have thought it smart to go there either, but it seems to me we've had enough contractors over there long enough to give the people a good chance in so far as infrastructure is concerned.
I am far less sanguine about how things will work out with regards to Iran.
The Iraqis have never wanted Ameican troops stationed there.
Yeah and I wish we'd only send them to places which had sent us an invite in the first place......
As far as a "win" is concerned, if anything Obama has if anything made more certain than otherwise that this would be a loss........