I still wish that after Stein started all this, that some conservative organizations would have stepped up and insisted on a recount in CA, because even though it wouldn't have changed the majority vote, I still say they would have found around a million unauthorized and/or false votes. I'm sure the state would have charged $50 million to do it though (and offered it for free (taxpayer expense) if for some reason the vote here would have gone the other way).
I'm too lazy to look up hard numbers, but I speculate that at least 80% of the time when recounts are performed, they find the original count favored Ds and the recounts favored Rs. I was going to say that, knowing that, I was perplexed at Stein's reasoning, but really, it almost fits into that term I brought up elsewhere - "retraction reporting". A big deal was made about the recount, and Trump and the ruskies stealing the election, but now that recounts have found the errors to be in Clinton's favor, you don't see much in the MSM about those numbers.
The original narrative is still at the forefront, regardless of the evidence. Or if anything, somehow the recounts were manipulated.
