Remember, odds are, she'll get the majority of the assets plus a monthly payment in the divorce.
Unless I'm reading the article incorrectly, the guy isn't that bad. She even admits so. He just has a number of mild habits she finds annoying. On the other hand, she apparently dislikes fidelity being a requirement of marriage. Plus she's unhappy that she's aging, that just because people in kindergarten told you that you are special does not make it so, and apparently gets upset because he works to pay the bills. The bit about feeling bad if she had to remove the gentleman from "his son's house" is downright creepy. Lady, unless you had a fulltime job that you neglected to meantion in your multitude of horrid rants of the oppressiveness of living responsibly, he paid for the friggin house.
While she doesn't quite flat out say it, she considers it her 'job' to be married. That she's entitled to an interesting life, that her husband should do nothing that isn't Oprah/Martha approved, and that divorces are no big deal. Honey, divorces bankrupt at least one partner in the marriage often enough and tramatize the kids. Sometimes, this is a far better situation than during the marriage. Plenty of folks end up in marriages that are horribly abusing. Getting bored and frustrated by the fact that life did't give you every little thing is not abuse.
For the love of all the Gods, lady, you can find something to fill your day without crushing the souls of those around you. Open up a small home business, get involved in a charity, get a degree (or another degree), write a book, do SOMETHING besides whining of what a pathetic life you have.
