Isn't this ruling pretty much in conflict with Heller and McDonald?
I started to read the actual decision. It appears that the majority is claiming that
Heller determined that the RKBA ONLY applies to firearms within the home, so they claim they are "following" the precedent established by
Heller.
That's a lie, of course. The question asked in
Heller was whether a D.C. law that specifically prohibited the possession of a functional, operable firearm in the home violated the Constitution. Since that was the question asked, that was the question they answered. ANY laws addressing possession or carry outside of the home were simply not addressed by
Heller.