Armed Polite Society
Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: MechAg94 on June 23, 2021, 09:37:13 AM
-
Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/06/handgun-or-pistol-against-bear-attacks-104-cases-97-effective/#ixzz6ycPEJq8A
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
Handgun or Pistol Against Bear Attacks 104 cases, 97% Effective
They list each case further down in the article. Said they only counted cases where the pistol was fired. Interesting research.
-
I think we had a thread like this a few years ago.
Any of these cases from the Scranton area?
-
Any of these cases from the Scranton area?
:laugh:
How many bears have been stopped by beets?
-
Thanks for posting that.
-
:laugh:
How many bears have been stopped by beets?
Would a pistol shooting beets still be 97% effective? Might depend on if the bear will eat beets.
-
Would a pistol shooting beets still be 97% effective? Might depend on if the bear will eat beets.
Only bears who watch Battlestar Galactica will eat beets.
-
:laugh:
How many bears have been stopped by beets?
They were almost universally beet'n into submission.
-
That is pretty interesting.
How effective is bear spray in comparision?
-
" Said they only counted cases where the pistol was fired. "
But what about cases in which the handgun was fired?
-
Setting jokes aside a moment, what I found interesting is that caliber seems less important than I thought, given my vast experience reading gun magazines and web pages since I was 16 years old. I recall reading an article on firearms in bear country which basically said if you had to carry a handgun, it better be .44 magnum or more. Guess some of these bears didn't read that article..
-
Very surprising information.
A lot of very up close and personal shoots.
-
Setting jokes aside a moment, what I found interesting is that caliber seems less important than I thought, given my vast experience reading gun magazines and web pages since I was 16 years old. I recall reading an article on firearms in bear country which basically said if you had to carry a handgun, it better be .44 magnum or more. Guess some of these bears didn't read that article..
I was thinking that while bears might charge you and kill you despite shooting, most of the time they aren't that mad or determined. Could also be someone who is armed is more likely to be paying attention and not be blindsided by the attack. Just guesses.
-
In the eastern woods I carry a gun for two legged tweakers and feral dogs. Bear have never been a problem. Sat down in the trail to watch one, fell asleep, woke up and considered I ought to know where the bear was, went back to sleep instead.