"No Guns" sign violates zero-tolerance

[Perd Hapley]

Rest assured, America. Your left-wing never tires of finding new ways to explore the boundaries of derp.

Surely, this is a parody web site.

Nope, it appears to be for serious.

Derp-derp-derp. Derp.

[Strings]

And, per Michael Z's blog, the school official quoted in the article is taken out of context... resulting in "our side" treating her less than respectfully

[Perd Hapley]

And, per Michael Z's blog, the school official quoted in the article is taken out of context... resulting in "our side" treating her less than respectfully

I guess you mean this blog?
http://www.michaelzwilliamson.com/blog/

I scanned the little tete a tete there, and I'm not sure how it makes the comments less derpish, or how they were taken out of context, or how she's being treated with less respect that otherwise (keeping in mind the internet respects no one).

Can you explain for those of us who just woke up, and haven't had our tea just yet?

[Scout26]

"I think if it ultimately helps to keep schools safe, that’s the objective."

The fail is strong with that one.

[fifth_column]

“I think the general public will be alarmed by it and wonder if people have been allowed to bring guns to school in the past,” Nolan said.

I think she might have an even lower opinion of the general public than I do.

Which, considering she's been an "educator" for 22 years is really quite frightening.  Since she's directly responsible for the education of many of those in the general public she has such a low opinion of . . .

[Ron]

I think she might have an even lower opinion of the general public than I do.

Which, considering she's been an "educator" for 22 years is really quite frightening.  Since she's directly responsible for the education of many of those in the general public she has such a low opinion of . . .

She just knows what type of product her and her colleagues have been producing over the years.

[griz]

Pardon my literalness, but I think she is right but for the wrong reason.  Following the faulty logic of "anything related to guns is dangerous", they have banned even the image of a gun in schools.  So the sign, bearing the silhouette of a gun, is in violation of the law it is enforcing.

I am not a layer.

[Perd Hapley]

The derp. It is spreading. Some politician in Illinois had this to say about the no-guns signs:

http://www.oakpark.com/News/Articles/2-18-2014/No-sign%3F-No-guns/

I received a call this week from an Oak Park mom troubled by having to explain to her six-year-old why there were suddenly pictures of guns everywhere.  I'm told psychiatrists and psychologists are investigating the effects of the visual bombardment we will endure, particularly on our children. Senate Bill 2669 might address that risk.

Yes, the visual bombardment we've endured in every other state in the union has been horrifying. 

[230RN]

Well, so much for that statue.

[Scout26]

The derp. It is spreading. Some politician in Illinois had this to say about the no-guns signs:

http://www.oakpark.com/News/Articles/2-18-2014/No-sign%3F-No-guns/


Yes, the visual bombardment we've endured in every other state in the union has been horrifying. 

Here's a thought.  Make less places off-limits then.

[Perd Hapley]

Here's a thought.  Make less places off-limits then.

Naturally, he goes in a much different direction. His solution is to criminalize carry in any place where guns aren't specifically welcomed. "Guns Welcome" signs, instead of "No Guns" signs.