« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Phil Robertson vindicated?  (Read 851 times)

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,456
  • My prepositions are on/in
Phil Robertson vindicated?
« on: February 11, 2014, 11:17:00 PM »
One of the Duck Dynast's controversial statements (that went all but unnoticed) averred the relative happiness of black Americans, before the black civil rights movement. A justice of the supreme court seems to be agreeing with him. Well, sort of.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2557185/America-sensitive-race-says-Supreme-Court-justice.html


« Last Edit: February 12, 2014, 06:13:57 PM by fistful »
Report to moderator   Logged
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

Sergeant Bob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,861
Re: Phil Robertson vindicated?
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2014, 05:43:41 PM »
Of course the flaming libs all cried "Teh Jim Crow!!" at his statement about the relative happiness of blacks in the South.
Report to moderator   Logged
Personally, I do not understand how a bunch of people demanding a bigger govt can call themselves anarchist.
I meet lots of folks like this, claim to be anarchist but really they're just liberals with pierced genitals. - gunsmith

I already have canned butter, buying more. Canned blueberries, some pancake making dry goods and the end of the world is gonna be delicious.  -French G

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Phil Robertson vindicated?
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2014, 11:41:54 AM »
Why (or how) would a statement that boils down to an anecdote about the folks he personally knew growing up need vindication?  ???
Report to moderator   Logged
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.
Pages: [1]
« previous next »