Author Topic: FCC has Bandwidth Throttled in Net Neutrality Protest: The Ferengi Plan  (Read 1490 times)

Ned Hamford

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,075
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/134371-FCC-Throttled-By-NeoCities-In-Net-Neutrality-Protest

This was done by NeoCities, who has offered the throttle code to anyone else who would like to offer a *Ferengi Plan to the FCC too.  I like how readily apparent this makes it for ease of limiting; effectively blocking access, to those pro-net 'management' folks who insist artificial constraints and money sinks could only improve availability and pricing for everyone. 
*Ferengis are a star trek species who are known for their avarice.  See the Ferengi Rules of Acquisition.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_Acquisition



Improbus a nullo flectitur obsequio.

Scout26

  • I'm a leaf on the wind.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25,997
  • I spent a week in that town one night....
And here is (literally) the money quote:

Quote
"If porn sites did this, net neutrality would be fixed in a day"
Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants won't help.


Bring me my Broadsword and a clear understanding.
Get up to the roundhouse on the cliff-top standing.
Take women and children and bed them down.
Bless with a hard heart those that stand with me.
Bless the women and children who firm our hands.
Put our backs to the north wind.
Hold fast by the river.
Sweet memories to drive us on,
for the motherland.

birdman

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,831
My take on net neutrality:
Are you a netflix/streaming media subscriber?  If yes, You pay less than you should on your service now, and will pay more to netflix for your subscription in the future.
If no, you are paying more than you should for your internet service.

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
What's the point, exactly?  If it's to prove that throttling is technically feasible, even easy, then why bother?  We already knew that.

And why on earth would porn sites do this?  Why would anybody who wants their content to be readily available?

Ned Hamford

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,075
What's the point, exactly?  If it's to prove that throttling is technically feasible, even easy, then why bother?  We already knew that.
And why on earth would porn sites do this?  Why would anybody who wants their content to be readily available?

But that is not what is being said is or will be happening.  Bald face lies are being told about how giving every ISP the right to throttle will makes things faster and more fair for everyone.  Then rather than admitting there will be winners and losers chosen (IE: Netflix), there are evasions.

Watch a few speeches by the pro-Net Management folks. They sound great as long as there are no followup questions.  But they are outright lying about the nature of the infrastructure. 

And as for this notion about Netflix users using/getting more than their fair share of bandwidth... Are we not paying for it?  That seems a problem with the promises by the ISP providers and their contracts.  My contract says unlimited data, bandwidth average of 60mb/s.  Watching a show on Netflix, set to hi-def, uses 3.6 mb/s.  The only problem is ISPs over-promising, relying on usage rates that predated the use of youtube and netflix (AKA, modern typical mainstream usage).  They want more money for less work; no further infrastructure development, ect ect and they are working the government and public ignorance to get it. 

If I am using less than 10% of my contracted average availability at my PEAK usage, no, I do not think I am using more than my Fair Share

Rabble Rabble Rabble
Improbus a nullo flectitur obsequio.

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Quote
My contract says unlimited data

I guess that word doesn't mean what we think it means ...  :facepalm:
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

bedlamite

  • Hold my beer and watch this!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9,797
  • Ack! PLBTTPHBT!
A plan is just a list of things that doesn't happen.
Is defenestration possible through the overton window?

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
But that is not what is being said is or will be happening.  Bald face lies are being told about how giving every ISP the right to throttle will makes things faster and more fair for everyone.  Then rather than admitting there will be winners and losers chosen (IE: Netflix), there are evasions.
Every ISP already has the right to throttle, there's nothing in the law that prevents it or empowers the Feds to regulate it.  And yet they aren't doing it.  The only serious attempt by an ISP to violate neutrality was shut down hard by the marketplace.  ISPs aren't doing it now, and there's nothing but fear mongering to suggest that they're going to start.  

Government-imposed neutrality rules are a solution in search of a problem.  And they're dangerous.

I'm worried about the unexplainable stubborn insistence of the FCC to claim authority to regulate the internet.  They clearly don't need this power, and we don't need to give them this power, because the internet is not broken in any way that net government-imposed neutrality rules would fix.  FCC has been told, over and over again, by both congress and the courts, that they don't have this power, that they're acting illegally.  Yet they keep doing it anyway.  Yay for out of control government...?

The internet is the most powerful tool the people have for working together outside of government, or for working against the government if/when the need arises.  I want to keep the government and their greedy hands as far away from it as possible.  Unless someone can prove a real-world, real-time need for government-imposed rules on ISPs, based on more than wild speculation, then I'm against them.
« Last Edit: May 10, 2014, 02:10:25 PM by Headless Thompson Gunner »