Author Topic: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces  (Read 2249 times)

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« on: October 07, 2014, 03:40:44 PM »
Are you Strong Enough? An interview with Mark Rippetoe

http://rhinoden.rangerup.com/are-you-strong-enough-an-interview-with-mark-rippetoe/

Don't know this Rippitoe fellow, but I might be interested in his news letter.

To sum up, Rippitoe and many folk in the services think a greater emphasis on physical strength is more applicable than the current all-endurance, all-the-time regimen.

Quote
Mark Rippetoe PT Test

    Double bodyweight deadlift.
    Standing Overhead Press with 75% of bodyweight on the bar.
    Chin-ups-12 minimum
    400 meters in 75 seconds or less.


Quote
I think a Soldier should be able to do 12 chin-ups and run 400 meters in 75 seconds or less. The additional benefit of having the press, chin-up, and 400 meter run tests is that they do away with the need to do body composition testing, which takes up a lot of time and can be a problem for muscular Soldiers. If Soldiers are too fat they are not going to be able to meet those standards. But if you have a person that would be too fat under the present metrics, but who can still do 12 chin-ups and run a 75-second 400, let him stay! People like this are not hurting anything, because they are physically capable of doing the job. I think you would still need assessments that are mission-specific, but these would be the most basic testing standards, and I think they cover all your bases much better than the current assessments.

I would include a longer-distance run or (preferably) a ruck march requirement.

Comment at the article:
Quote
Doing those four components doesn’t mean you can ruck 20 miles with 70+ pounds of gear.

Then again, being a two mile ten minute man doesn’t mean you can ruck 20 miles with 70+ pounds of gear.

You have to find the balance in all of it.
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

brimic

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,270
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2014, 03:59:29 PM »
A lot of the crossfit/RK trainers go more for efficiency of time used than anything else. Running for a 1/2 hour is seen as a waste of time when you can get the same cardio benefits while lifting weights and gaining in overall strength.
ex: You can interval train just by deadlifting a light weight (135lb olympic bar) or swinging/snatching a 40-50 lb kettlebell 20 seconds on/10 seconds off for 5 minute blocks of time. Not only will it make you a lot stronger over all, but it will get your heart moving faster than you could do just by running.
"now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb" -Dark Helmet

"AK47's belong in the hands of soldiers mexican drug cartels"-
Barack Obama

Scout26

  • I'm a leaf on the wind.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25,997
  • I spent a week in that town one night....
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2014, 04:30:29 PM »
The Germans always thought that our PT test was a joke.  Theirs was more combat oriented as opposed to general "fitness".


Meanwhile, Grandpa was doing Cross-fit before it was cool.


http://www.artofmanliness.com/2011/09/12/are-you-as-fit-as-a-world-war-ii-gi/
Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants won't help.


Bring me my Broadsword and a clear understanding.
Get up to the roundhouse on the cliff-top standing.
Take women and children and bed them down.
Bless with a hard heart those that stand with me.
Bless the women and children who firm our hands.
Put our backs to the north wind.
Hold fast by the river.
Sweet memories to drive us on,
for the motherland.

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2014, 04:32:43 PM »
I think an even better test would be a combination ruck march immediately followed by some sort of combat fitness test.  Even for my beloved Corps.  The 3 mile run seems like an outdated method of testing endurance. 



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2014, 04:35:12 PM »
Are you Strong Enough? An interview with Mark Rippetoe

http://rhinoden.rangerup.com/are-you-strong-enough-an-interview-with-mark-rippetoe/

Don't know this Rippitoe fellow, but I might be interested in his news letter.

To sum up, Rippitoe and many folk in the services think a greater emphasis on physical strength is more applicable than the current all-endurance, all-the-time regimen.


I would include a longer-distance run or (preferably) a ruck march requirement.

Comment at the article:

That test would eliminate probably %90+ of all infantry. Double body weight deadlift? Lol.
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

brimic

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,270
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2014, 04:58:57 PM »
Double body weight deadlift? Lol.

I've seen women that can do it, and they aren't bodybuilders.
"now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb" -Dark Helmet

"AK47's belong in the hands of soldiers mexican drug cartels"-
Barack Obama

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2014, 05:09:17 PM »
I've seen women that can do it, and they aren't bodybuilders.


Ah, googled it and I see that I was thinking of the wrong exercise. In that case I have no idea how many of the guys in my unit could have done that.
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

Fitz

  • Face-melter
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,254
  • Floyd Rose is my homeboy
    • My Book
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #7 on: October 07, 2014, 05:25:02 PM »
Rippietoes program lost me 8 percent body fat, and got rid of my back pain while improving my general health

Strength will have endurance as a byproduct if you're doin it right
Fitz

---------------
I have reached a conclusion regarding every member of this forum.
I no longer respect any of you. I hope the following offends you as much as this thread has offended me:
You are all awful people. I mean this *expletive deleted*ing seriously.

-MicroBalrog

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #8 on: October 07, 2014, 05:58:35 PM »
I think an even better test would be a combination ruck march immediately followed by some sort of combat fitness test.  Even for my beloved Corps.  The 3 mile run seems like an outdated method of testing endurance. 

This. ^

Soldiers (generic term) need to be able to do soldier-things after getting from the start line to where soldier-things are to be done.  Figure out what they will need to get to where the job is and then make the standard (for non-SF types at least) 2X that.

Chin-ups are good for PT but has anybody ever done a standard chin-up (jump up, grab bar and hang, pull up, drop down & hang) in a combat setting?  Jumping up and grabbing for a window ledge and hauling yourself and your gear over it is more likely.  Do PT to warm up, then head to the obstacle course for training.

And having been one, the REMF desk jockeys need to do that, too.

stay safe.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.

RoadKingLarry

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,841
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #9 on: October 07, 2014, 09:48:32 PM »
Navy PT test was a real joke. I always managed to come in mid scale but because I usually had a little extra padding I was borderline fat boy team. Funniest was once during an inport fire drill myself and the commands top fitness guru both had to to don air fed fire suits.  Top fitness dude fell out after less than 15 minutes and had to be revived and taken off the boat for heat stress treatment and ended up overnight in the hospital with an IV.  I got done after almost half an hour and drank a big glass of cool water and went back to work.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #10 on: October 07, 2014, 09:54:50 PM »
Ah, googled it and I see that I was thinking of the wrong exercise. In that case I have no idea how many of the guys in my unit could have done that.

Well, if they trained at it once per week as part of a strength program at the same intensity they trained at endurance, I'd bet that 100% could do it. 
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

Strings

  • APS Pimp
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,195
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #11 on: October 08, 2014, 12:36:08 AM »
You also need the graders to follow guidelines

Have a friend who just failed the Army PT Test. Reason? His pushups didn't bounce his chest off the floor

Hell... when I took the SEAL test, lo those years ago, I was bouncing my chest off the grader's balled fist: never had to go down to the ground...
No Child Should Live In Fear

What was that about a pearl handled revolver and someone from New Orleans again?

Screw it: just autoclave the planet (thanks Birdman)

wmenorr67

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,775
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #12 on: October 08, 2014, 06:46:12 AM »
You also need the graders to follow guidelines

Have a friend who just failed the Army PT Test. Reason? His pushups didn't bounce his chest off the floor

Hell... when I took the SEAL test, lo those years ago, I was bouncing my chest off the grader's balled fist: never had to go down to the ground...

Funny thing is that if your chest touches the ground by regulation you are to stop the test and you would fail also.  I have gotten more people pissed at that observation than I can count over the years.
There are five things, above all else, that make life worth living: a good relationship with God, a good woman, good health, good friends, and a good cigar.

Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier.  One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

Bacon is the candy bar of meats!

Only the dead have seen the end of war!

French G.

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,195
  • ohhh sparkles!
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #13 on: October 08, 2014, 07:19:34 AM »
I'm not a PT god, I despise running in my advanced years, so I don't. But the navy can go piss up a hawser as far as their test. If someone fails by 1 second on the run it can wreck their career for years, same as 1% over on body fat. Yet we will use the most inaccurate measurements possible for those items. I have run the 1.5 mile run on 1.25 mile and 1.8 mile courses. I failed PT twice back in 01-02, once on my own damn fault, the second after 6 months of working hard, but it was mid-April on the aforementioned 1.8 mile course, 2 pm and 93 degrees, I wasn't sweating, just turning red and there was no doc. Regulations for that heat( 1 degree shy of black flag) are PT for those acclimated 12 weeks prior. 12 weeks prior I was working on a helo head in sleet and rain.  So basically every burden of regulation lands on the member, how we run the program? Who knows.

LOL for a selection board, I had an eval first line that was verbatim "Would be ranked much higher if not a two time PFA failure." LOL. Basically in 2001 I was on track to be the 8 year chief. I at that eval until at least 2007, got out in 2008 when I probably had a good shot. Don't mind, it was my doing.

The BMI part eats me. When I failed that first PT I was 230-ish with no muscle tone, I lived on restaurant food, did no exercise and ate constantly. But hey, I had a 19" neck! 18% BF.  Nowadays I am 225, a lot more upper body due to my job, not fat in the midsection and eat a lot more sparingly. But my neck is no longer fat and measures 1-3" less depending on who is taping. Fattest part of my gut tapes 38-40. I wear 38 pants because no one makes 37s anymore. They fall off. But since I don't inflate my neck or suck in my gut I tape out to max acceptable BF of 22% Yeah, no. Chest is 50", waist 38" thinking that if I am 22 what is the guy with his gut hanging out of his t-shirt? Oh wait, 20" neck, you're good fatboy.
AKA Navy Joe   

I'm so contrarian that I didn't respond to the thread.

41magsnub

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,579
  • Don't make me assume my ultimate form!
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #14 on: October 08, 2014, 09:47:23 AM »
I agree with all of this.  As a combat engineer we needed strength a lot more than speed.  The marathon runners who maxed the PT test each time fell apart once you put a picket pounder in their hands, or anything else involving moving something besides their own body.  No upper body strength.

Fitz

  • Face-melter
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,254
  • Floyd Rose is my homeboy
    • My Book
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #15 on: October 08, 2014, 10:13:34 AM »
You also need the graders to follow guidelines

Have a friend who just failed the Army PT Test. Reason? His pushups didn't bounce his chest off the floor

Hell... when I took the SEAL test, lo those years ago, I was bouncing my chest off the grader's balled fist: never had to go down to the ground...

Or the graders that will fail a long armed guy like myself because they don't "like" wide arm pushups

The standard is "Arms where they're comfortable for me" and "until the upper arm is parallel to the ground."


It's IN THE GODDAMN REG


and yet, we still have aholes popping their hand under the tested Soldier, insisting on close hand pushups, or ranting about "breaking the plane."
Fitz

---------------
I have reached a conclusion regarding every member of this forum.
I no longer respect any of you. I hope the following offends you as much as this thread has offended me:
You are all awful people. I mean this *expletive deleted*ing seriously.

-MicroBalrog

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,807
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #16 on: October 08, 2014, 10:21:27 AM »
How long would one of those body builders like on the article photo last?
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

brimic

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,270
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #17 on: October 08, 2014, 10:32:53 AM »
How long would one of those body builders like on the article photo last?

I have a friend from HS who is a Green Beret- I ran into him for the first time in 10 years last year at a wedding down in the carribean. He looks like a freaking pro wrestler, so it must be working for him.
"now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb" -Dark Helmet

"AK47's belong in the hands of soldiers mexican drug cartels"-
Barack Obama

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #18 on: October 08, 2014, 12:10:18 PM »
How long would one of those body builders like on the article photo last?

If he's a body builder, he is in the off-season.  Looks more like a power lifter or other sort of athlete doing strength training.  Body-builders in-season generally do crazy amounts of cardio to get ripped.  If they get bodyfat too low (lower than / half the bodyfat percentage of many Olympic/Pro class athletes), they can have problems if they were to be required to do really heavy work over a longer period of time.  There is a toll to bodyfat being that low and body builders usually only keep it that low for a limited period of time.  They are in a state of malnourishment, essentially. 

When it comes to high-effort tasks, body builders and power lifters can maintain some crazy levels of effort.  A lot of those "world's strongest man" competitions are not just absolute strength/force tasks, but consist in applying that force over distance or time.  In physics work is energy expended over distance and power is work done over time. 


Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #19 on: October 08, 2014, 12:15:23 PM »
I have a friend from HS who is a Green Beret- I ran into him for the first time in 10 years last year at a wedding down in the carribean. He looks like a freaking pro wrestler, so it must be working for him.

I don't know the guy and he may be genetically gifted, but the prevalence of PEDs in USASOC was pretty high.  As it is in many LEO orgs. 

PEDs will allow for maxing PT tests and still being built like a pro wrestler by reducing recovery time.  Keeping up with SF/Ranger/Delta PT puts a pretty hard cap on the size you can develop naturally. 
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

brimic

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,270
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #20 on: October 08, 2014, 12:53:38 PM »
I don't know the guy and he may be genetically gifted, but the prevalence of PEDs in USASOC was pretty high.  As it is in many LEO orgs. 

PEDs will allow for maxing PT tests and still being built like a pro wrestler by reducing recovery time.  Keeping up with SF/Ranger/Delta PT puts a pretty hard cap on the size you can develop naturally. 

Could be- he played football in HS, and he was never that huge or ripped then.
Then again, its the difference between a hobby/game and a profession.
"now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb" -Dark Helmet

"AK47's belong in the hands of soldiers mexican drug cartels"-
Barack Obama

KD5NRH

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,926
  • I'm too sexy for you people.
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #21 on: October 08, 2014, 01:17:05 PM »
Chest is 50", waist 38" thinking that if I am 22 what is the guy with his gut hanging out of his t-shirt?

Industry standard, apparently.  With an 17.5" collar, 43" chest and 34" waist, I'm "slim fit" by dress shirt standards.  Regular fit looks like a damaged wingsuit on me, in spite of a fair amount of gut.  (Much more and I would have to avoid some belt buckles, but I'm working on getting rid of it.)  Suit jackets in 42R or 44R, single or double breasted, on the other hand, are usually pretty close all the way, so I guess the fatter guys just can't button them at all.

erictank

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,410
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #22 on: October 09, 2014, 11:24:17 AM »
I'm not a PT god, I despise running in my advanced years, so I don't. But the navy can go piss up a hawser as far as their test. If someone fails by 1 second on the run it can wreck their career for years, same as 1% over on body fat. Yet we will use the most inaccurate measurements possible for those items. I have run the 1.5 mile run on 1.25 mile and 1.8 mile courses. I failed PT twice back in 01-02, once on my own damn fault, the second after 6 months of working hard, but it was mid-April on the aforementioned 1.8 mile course, 2 pm and 93 degrees, I wasn't sweating, just turning red and there was no doc. Regulations for that heat( 1 degree shy of black flag) are PT for those acclimated 12 weeks prior. 12 weeks prior I was working on a helo head in sleet and rain.  So basically every burden of regulation lands on the member, how we run the program? Who knows.

LOL for a selection board, I had an eval first line that was verbatim "Would be ranked much higher if not a two time PFA failure." LOL. Basically in 2001 I was on track to be the 8 year chief. I at that eval until at least 2007, got out in 2008 when I probably had a good shot. Don't mind, it was my doing.

The BMI part eats me. When I failed that first PT I was 230-ish with no muscle tone, I lived on restaurant food, did no exercise and ate constantly. But hey, I had a 19" neck! 18% BF.  Nowadays I am 225, a lot more upper body due to my job, not fat in the midsection and eat a lot more sparingly. But my neck is no longer fat and measures 1-3" less depending on who is taping. Fattest part of my gut tapes 38-40. I wear 38 pants because no one makes 37s anymore. They fall off. But since I don't inflate my neck or suck in my gut I tape out to max acceptable BF of 22% Yeah, no. Chest is 50", waist 38" thinking that if I am 22 what is the guy with his gut hanging out of his t-shirt? Oh wait, 20" neck, you're good fatboy.

Right there with you, French. I have been big all my life (and have spent a good bit of that time as outright fat). I'm currently fat - been out for a long time, of course - but am currently at actual measurements of a 52" chest and a 46" waist (I wear size 42W pants, just one size up from my size as of my separation from the Navy in 1997). But even in boot camp, when I was approaching or was in the very best shape of my life, I was bouncing up against the BMI limits because of how they do rope-and-choke. I graduated boot camp 20 pounds lighter than I went in, 5" off the waist, visible ribs (though not abs - I didn't work THAT hard!), and my entire family walked right past me in the airport because they did not recognize me. Navy called that 19% body fat IIRC, because of my skinny neck. Fought that the entire way through my time in the Navy, and it did contribute to my decision not to stay in, as I recognized I'd be at risk of a fatboy discharge the entire time and did not want that hanging over my head.

I was HIGHLY annoyed by a senior chief in my division who would take me to task over my poor BMI scores - who passed his own because he had a huge neck to go with the gut bigger than mine.

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,011
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #23 on: October 09, 2014, 12:15:37 PM »
^^^These BF comments intrigued me, so I found the US Army body fat calculator online.  According to my age and measurements that I plugged in, I have 18% body fat.  I am surprised by this for a middle-aged guy that could still stand to lose a few pounds. 
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

KD5NRH

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,926
  • I'm too sexy for you people.
Re: Strength vs Endurance in the Armed Forces
« Reply #24 on: October 09, 2014, 01:09:57 PM »
^^^These BF comments intrigued me, so I found the US Army body fat calculator online.  According to my age and measurements that I plugged in, I have 18% body fat.  I am surprised by this for a middle-aged guy that could still stand to lose a few pounds. 

By most of the BMI calculators, I fluctuate right on the line between "normal" and "overweight."  I can see my toes, but not my belt buckle.