Told you not to go there.
So you go there.
It is nowhere near as hard to prove now with the advent of "rape kits" and DNA and other forensic techniques.
And I am not "singling out" rape as a "special case to threaten the victim."
You called what I said stupid. Well, THAT was stupid, in spades.
Anyone making a false police report alleging a non existant felony with malice aforethought should be prosecuted for the crime it is, rape, murder, bank robbery, what-ever.
"Told you not to go there." 1: where did you tell me that? 2: Oh teh noes, sumdood on APS told me not to go there!!!
Rape kits can prove you had sex, maybe even rough sex. Can't prove consent wasn't given. Lot of folks are into rough sex.
The post I quoted was singling out rape, you then responded agreeing with the post I had quoted which singled out rape. Ergo, you were singling out rape.
"I know you are but what am I" wasn't clever in grade school, and it's still a poor argument.
We currently have false reporting laws, and a prosecutor could easily charge the person with lots of other things as well. A new law that the prosecutor isn't enforcing will accomplish nothing.
Rape is a special case as merely proving that the act happened does not prove the crime. You prove that X robbed a bank, and you're done. But for rape, you need to prove not only that X had sex with Y, but that Y either did not or was not able to consent.