Author Topic: changing "no firearms" policy  (Read 3815 times)

geronimotwo

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,796
changing "no firearms" policy
« on: January 23, 2008, 01:57:18 AM »
i am a local volunteer fireman. our member handbook is pretty specific about guns.

"Firearms  Firearms are not to be on the premises of the fire department at any time. This policy excludes on duty police officers, but does include weapons in vehicles and on the person."

fortunatly, the members are able to change policies with a majority vote. before i bring this up at a meeting, i would like to have better ammo to make the best argument for getting this policy dropped.

any practical arguments would be appreciated, thanks.

g2
make the world idiot proof.....and you will have a world full of idiots. -g2

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2008, 03:11:53 AM »
First and foremost would be if you're in a concealed carry state.  My second issue would be if anyone there hunts.
In creating your argument, mention that firemen are trusted public servants.  If you can't be trusted by your superiors, then why should the public trust you?
In rewording the policy in your proposal, you should mention that weapons be possessed or stored in compliance with all local, state and federal laws. 
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

280plus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,131
  • Ever get that sinking feeling?
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2008, 03:26:22 AM »
I'm pretty sure you aren't supposed to run into an active fire carrying a loaded firearm. You don't want the rounds to start cooking off on you. Chances are, if it's that hot, you're in deep doo doo already and you don't need anything else to go wrong, ESPECIALLY rounds bursting at your waistline.

That said it brings up issues of ok, I can take the gun off before I get suited up but how do I ENSURE it is secure. To me, leaving it in the car is not secure and neither is a locker. I suggest you think hard about how you could overcome this situation in the context of yours and the dept's particular needs and present it as part of your argument.
Avoid cliches like the plague!

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2008, 03:32:53 AM »
Leaving it in a locked car at a firedepartment is secure to me.  No diff than a criminal breaking into my house.
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

mfree

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,637
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2008, 03:36:02 AM »
Er, if you're cooking off cartridges in a gun strapped to your waist, you have deeper problems than the cook-off, because that wonderful bacon smell is likely *you*.

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2008, 03:50:57 AM »
I'm sure the LA fire department would have liked to have had guns during the LA riots.

What if you respond to a fire and it turns out to be a meth lab?

geronimotwo

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,796
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2008, 06:54:00 AM »
First and foremost would be if you're in a concealed carry state.  My second issue would be if anyone there hunts.
In creating your argument, mention that firemen are trusted public servants.  If you can't be trusted by your superiors, then why should the public trust you?
In rewording the policy in your proposal, you should mention that weapons be possessed or stored in compliance with all local, state and federal laws. 


yes, NY is a carry state with a permit (9 month process for me). we are a rural department, so not only is hunting big for locals, but we have many "guest" hunters as well (in fact we always need to perform a search or two for lost hunters every year, another good reason to carry as their are bear and coyote around). there are also two other members who are part of the local pistol club.

I'm pretty sure you aren't supposed to run into an active fire carrying a loaded firearm. You don't want the rounds to start cooking off on you.

most of our calls are not house fires. we have around 150 motor vehicle accidents, as well as over 500 ambulance calls per year. some of these will be for domestic violence.

then there's bingo every week. 60-100 people gathered in a "no weapons zone" where cash is given away.
make the world idiot proof.....and you will have a world full of idiots. -g2

Paddy

  • Guest
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2008, 07:16:40 AM »
I'm sure the LA fire department would have liked to have had guns during the LA riots.

What if you respond to a fire and it turns out to be a meth lab?

Or if space aliens attacked?  Fire personnel won't enter until the premises have been secured by law enforcement.

Chris

  • Guest
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2008, 07:20:12 AM »
I'm sure the LA fire department would have liked to have had guns during the LA riots.

What if you respond to a fire and it turns out to be a meth lab?

Well, I am not a firefighter, and don't play one on TV, but if the house fire turns out to be a burning meth lab, and the cooks are fighting from the inside to protect their product, a certain song comes to mind...

"The roof.  The roof.  The roof is on fire.  We don't need no water, let the m----- f----- burn!"

Scarecrow

  • New Member
  • Posts: 19
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2008, 07:29:25 AM »
I think keeping a gun in your car is secure enough. some states even say that you can have a gun in your car even without a permit because they consider it an extention of your home, such as Louisiana
I used to be so indecisive.... now I'm not so sure.

280plus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,131
  • Ever get that sinking feeling?
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2008, 08:36:38 AM »
Quote
some states even say that you can have a gun in your car even without a permit because they consider it an extention of your home, such as Louisiana
Hmph, did not know that... Call me Ishmael or whatever but I've never liked leaving my gun in the car attended. I want it on me or in the safe, nowhere else. So I'm either paranoid or a control freak.  grin

But geronimo's explanation is reasonable. If he's comfortable with it that's the bottom line.

And firemen have been known to be pulled out of fires a bit scorched but still alive, it happens. Why take the chance of futhering the injuries?
Avoid cliches like the plague!

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,475
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2008, 12:07:11 PM »

And firemen have been known to be pulled out of fires a bit scorched but still alive, it happens. Why take the chance of futhering the injuries?


You think mutant ninja zombie bears won't attack you, just because you're fighting a fire?  Moron!  Tongue
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

geronimotwo

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,796
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #12 on: January 23, 2008, 01:28:38 PM »
the biggest problem is the no "weapons in vehicles", as when i carry, and there is a call, it leaves nowhere but home to take the gun to. this causes an unnecessary delay.
make the world idiot proof.....and you will have a world full of idiots. -g2

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,475
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #13 on: January 23, 2008, 01:48:38 PM »
the biggest problem is the no "weapons in vehicles", as when i carry, and there is a call, it leaves nowhere but home to take the gun to. this causes an unnecessary delay.


That could be your biggest selling point, as it is a problem for the fire department and the public, not just for you.  "We're sorry your three children perished in that there fire, Ma'am, but half our force was going home to put their Glocks away. 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

Tuco

  • Fastest non-sequitur in the West.
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,119
  • If you miss you had better miss very well
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #14 on: January 23, 2008, 02:00:18 PM »
Quote
Call me Ishmael or whatever


ISHMAEL!!!

WHATEVER!!!


Nya nya nya na na!
7-11 was a part time job.

280plus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,131
  • Ever get that sinking feeling?
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #15 on: January 23, 2008, 02:21:14 PM »
Ok, I forgot about the mutant teenage zombie ninja bears...  undecided
Avoid cliches like the plague!

geronimotwo

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,796
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2008, 03:35:49 AM »
I'm sure the LA fire department would have liked to have had guns during the LA riots.

What if you respond to a fire and it turns out to be a meth lab?

Or if space aliens attacked?  Fire personnel won't enter until the premises have been secured by law enforcement.

fire and ambulance personnel are supposed to wait for police to secure the area. this only works if 911 has been told there is a security issue. if the neighbor who calls in the fire neglects to mention that it's a meth lab......., or there could be a call of someone bleeding outside their home. after arriving on scene, you realize it's because of the angry spouse with a baseball bat is the reason their bleeding. law enforcement has no obligation to be on scene (or at least is not likely to arrive in our town) if their is no reason to believe a threat exists.

Ok, I forgot about the mutant teenage zombie ninja bears...  undecided

i once had a bear pass about twenty feet from my family and me in the wild, and i was VERY relieved that it took no interest in us (even though it gave no sign of having a sansetsukon).
make the world idiot proof.....and you will have a world full of idiots. -g2

Firethorn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,789
  • Where'd my explosive space modulator go?
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #17 on: January 24, 2008, 05:02:49 AM »
fire and ambulance personnel are supposed to wait for police to secure the area. this only works if 911 has been told there is a security issue. if the neighbor who calls in the fire neglects to mention that it's a meth lab......., or there could be a call of someone bleeding outside their home. after arriving on scene, you realize it's because of the angry spouse with a baseball bat is the reason their bleeding. law enforcement has no obligation to be on scene (or at least is not likely to arrive in our town) if their is no reason to believe a threat exists.

How about keeping a shotgun in the rack next to the fire axes?  Heck, keep some 'special' loads and use the excuse it's for quick removal of locks and such if necessary.  That'll transform it from a 'weapon' into a 'tool'.  'Multipurpose explosive charge dispensor'.  Have a box of lockcutter rounds, water disruptor rounds, a pepper ball or three, and a few slugs/buckshot.

For that matter a couple of suited up firefighters with axes should be able to 'handle' an angry spouse with a baseball bat.  Wink

geronimotwo

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,796
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #18 on: January 24, 2008, 07:06:16 AM »
For that matter a couple of suited up firefighters with axes should be able to 'handle' an angry spouse with a baseball bat.  Wink

hey, a set of nomex turnout gear is only around $1, why don't we just add a couple layers of kevlar to make them a little more puncture proof! actually the stuff is really tough, and i would bet a twenty that a .25 wouldn't go through.
make the world idiot proof.....and you will have a world full of idiots. -g2

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #19 on: January 24, 2008, 07:57:50 AM »
Just how many trained volunteers are they willing to dismiss ?  rolleyes


I'm a member of a rural wildland department.  I carry all the time on my land and in the neighborhood, and I'll be danged if I'm going to disarm out in the "wilds" fighting a fire.  Sometimes one or a few of us have to remain overnight on watch in some lonely places.  It's never been a problem so far, and if it becomes a problem then I will just quit.  That way I can stay home and defend my own property.

As far as rounds cooking off, a lot of wildland f/f's carry fusees in their packs for lighting backfires.  Though you're supposed to dispose of those before deploying your fire shelter  shocked
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #20 on: January 25, 2008, 06:30:14 AM »
fire and ambulance personnel are supposed to wait for police to secure the area. this only works if 911 has been told there is a security issue. if the neighbor who calls in the fire neglects to mention that it's a meth lab......., or there could be a call of someone bleeding outside their home. after arriving on scene, you realize it's because of the angry spouse with a baseball bat is the reason their bleeding. law enforcement has no obligation to be on scene (or at least is not likely to arrive in our town) if their is no reason to believe a threat exists.

How about keeping a shotgun in the rack next to the fire axes?  Heck, keep some 'special' loads and use the excuse it's for quick removal of locks and such if necessary.  That'll transform it from a 'weapon' into a 'tool'.  'Multipurpose explosive charge dispensor'.  Have a box of lockcutter rounds, water disruptor rounds, a pepper ball or three, and a few slugs/buckshot.

For that matter a couple of suited up firefighters with axes should be able to 'handle' an angry spouse with a baseball bat.  Wink


They make marine attachments for firing lines and flares, too.
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

Firethorn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,789
  • Where'd my explosive space modulator go?
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #21 on: January 25, 2008, 07:14:44 AM »
They make marine attachments for firing lines and flares, too.

The more uses, the better.  Great idea.   grin

secamp32

  • New Member
  • Posts: 3
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #22 on: January 25, 2008, 05:42:27 PM »
There are combo police/fire departments.  The police officers on patrol don turnout gear and fight fires.  The Port Authority of NY/NJ uses emergency services POs as FF.  They call it "Guns and Hoses".  Guns and firefighting is not exclusive.

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: changing "no firearms" policy
« Reply #23 on: January 26, 2008, 07:20:48 AM »
Quote
There are combo police/fire departments.

In the county just west of here, there are only two paid peace officers - the sheriff and undersheriff.  They are also the fire chiefs in their respective towns - the only two municipalities in that county.  There is only about 800-900 people in the whole county.

To my knowledge, though - neither of them is also a used car dealer  grin
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin