Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
I have to wonder how much of the current 'vid shots are basically there because politicians figure that it is better to hand people a placebo, and keep the panic-likely from panicking...
 
Because there are still folks who are masking, and I've actually seen a few glovers lately...
2
The Roundtable / Re: Question for the prepper types...
« Last post by WLJ on Today at 09:16:16 AM »
Drink your coffee black, end of problem. Any other way displeases the coffee god.
3
The Roundtable / Re: Oh Oh, Chongo! Danger Island
« Last post by MillCreek on Today at 09:14:08 AM »
To save people from having to look it up as I did, Generation Jones is a birth date from 1954 to 1965. Count me in as another fan of Jonny Quest.
4
The Roundtable / Re: SpaceX News
« Last post by WLJ on Today at 09:11:49 AM »
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/05/the-surprise-is-not-that-boeing-lost-commercial-crew-but-that-it-finished-at-all/

Well, I certainly hope the Starliner's first crewed flight is successful.

Quote
A few months later, NASA publicly announced its choice. Boeing would receive $4.2 billion to develop a "commercial crew" transportation system, and SpaceX would get $2.6 billion. It was not a total victory for Boeing, which had lobbied hard to win all of the funding. But the company still walked away with nearly two-thirds of the money and the widespread presumption that it would easily beat SpaceX to the space station.

That aged well  :facepalm:

Quote
But at least SpaceX was in its natural environment. Boeing's space division had never won a large fixed-price contract. Its leaders were used to operating in a cost-plus environment, in which Boeing could bill the government for all of its expenses and earn a fee. Cost overruns and delays were not the company's problem—they were NASA's. Now Boeing had to deliver a flyable spacecraft for a firm, fixed price.

Boeing struggled to adjust to this environment. Regarding complicated space projects, Boeing was used to spending other people's money. Now, every penny spent on Starliner meant one less penny in profit (or, ultimately, greater losses). This meant that Boeing allocated fewer resources to Starliner than it needed to thrive.

One wonders how much money could be saved and yet still have all the shiny toys the defense industry puts out if SpX's method was applied across the board for govt contractors.

5
Politics / Re: Israel Under Attack
« Last post by WLJ on Today at 09:05:51 AM »
They're cold and hot at the same time? 

Well the protesters have been 80-90% women, the other 10-20% think they're women.
6
Politics / Re: Israel Under Attack
« Last post by griz on Today at 09:02:54 AM »
"Hunger strikes for Hamas".

https://twitchy.com/brettt/2024/05/08/princeton-university-hunger-striker-for-hamas-is-literally-shaking-n2396044

The jokes really do write themselves.  :rofl:

They're cold and hot at the same time?  Quick, somebody do something!
7
The Roundtable / Re: SpaceX News
« Last post by MillCreek on Today at 09:01:27 AM »
8
The Roundtable / Re: Jeremy Clarkson, Gentleman Farmer
« Last post by dogmush on Today at 08:43:38 AM »

The fees to contest the council's denial of his restaurant application were going to be something like $600,000 US dollars, with no guarantee of success.


What's a Boeing Contractor's going rate?
9
Politics / Re: Israel Under Attack
« Last post by Ben on Today at 07:42:19 AM »
10
I'm fairly certain that the folks in the Bronx know how to start fires.

Yeah, but previously they had to do it with stolen fire.

If their fire keeper let their fire go out, they had to go on a quest to steal more fire.

Wait... is that life in the Bronx, or is that the plot to Quest for Fire?

I'm so confused...
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10