No, the problem, as was mentioned above, is the opening of the legislative door. For, as I have said before, what was passed as law today, can be changed tomorrow.
A year later...
Senator Nooyawker: "We can't have your yahoos from the middle of Nevada running around New York without training. We should have everybody go through a uniform training... say, 100 rounds at 100 yards within a 6 inch group."
Then starts the "compromising" and Senator Nevoody says, "You make that 50 yards and 50 rounds and a 12" circle and I'll vote for it if you'll vote for my pet water bill."
And Senator Nooyawker says, "Well, I won't vote for it, but I'll help sponsor it."
Senator Nevoody says, "Done and done. That makes my water bill 'bipartisan.' Got time for nine holes?"
An hyperbolic example, but meant to show how those things work. Before long, as someone said, you'll be operating under 50% California laws, and before much longer, 100% California laws. "They're in it for the long haul."
Beside, it strikes me, as a dyed in the wool strict constructionist, all laws pertaining to concealed carry should be declared unconstitutional if put to the test.
Frankly, it's neither Colorado's nor the Fed's business if I choose to bear my arms under my MAGA hat.
Well, that's pretty hyperbolic too, I reckon. At least with a .45.
Terry, 230RN
Edited for spelling error
