This is my shocked face
Always thought the fly by was doable timetable wise but the landing timetable was a bit ambiguous. Turns out both are going to be delayed by a considable margin due to issues with life support, launch abort sys, and the heat shield.
NASA delays Artemis 2 and 3 missions
https://spacenews.com/nasa-delays-artemis-2-and-3-missions/
This one was entirely predictable and cracks me up that people who follow space didn't see it coming years ago.
The maiden flight of "Orion" on a Delta IV Heavy used no ECLSS at all and had a different heat shield, known to be inferior to the intended one, but they launched it anyways.
The Artemis I mission launched on an SLS block 1 also had an incomplete ECLSS onboard and had reentry problems with its heat shield.
There was no reason to do the DIVH launch if the ECLSS isn't included, and the heatshield was a cobbled together affair.
To my mind, Orion still has never launched. As bad as it sounds, I think Orion needs a maiden manned flight doing a milk run to the ISS, assuming it isn't too large to dock at one of the IDA ports. It'd be awful to waste an SLS on that, though.