are we talking about the same arson case? i looked a long time at that one saw it differently
Maybe.
If you read some of the interview xscripts, maybe you'd think otherwise. They'd need squat for forensic evidence after the performance he gave. Just read his own words and play the tape to the jury and he'd be toast. When he passed, Texas's mean IQ went up a point or two and justice was done, IMO.
Re-looking at the fire forensics would be akin to consulting a shaman and having him look at chicken entrails. Fire forensic "science" was crap then and is crap now. I wouldn't re-open the case so current charlatans can shake their fetishes at the evidence.
If the IP or other folks want a
real, live guy who was convicted on such "science," they have several candidates to choose from. Here's one I knew who is presently in federal "pound me in the ass" prison on such "science."
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/DN-lonestar_08cco.ART0.West.Edition1.43cb5dc.htmlSeverns's case has been discussed in other venues besides DMN.
KBH is just pissed she lost to Governor Goodhair. And between Gov Goodhair and Debra Medina, 70% of Texas Republicans said to her, as she retires from the US Senate, "Don't let the door hit you in the *expletive deleted*ss on the way out." She is at heart a squish on this & many other issues and only grows a spine when Texans send her phone into orbit.
To make it plain, in case I haven't been:
Nobody ought to be convicted of jaywalking on the strength of contemporary fire forensic "science," let alone murder or arson. If the oxygen thief Texas offed a few years back had only such evidence against him, it would have been an injustice and I, as a juror, would have voted "not guilty."
Luckily for most of society, most crooks is dumb and some manage to talk their way into prison or worse.