Main Forums > Politics
Squatters Should Be Shot
Ben:
These squatter stories always irritate me, because in Ben's world <TM>, they get one chance to pay for the damages they caused and then leave. If they don't, you simply shoot them and that's that. I'm not even doing hyperbole. I would have no qualms killing someone who took over my home and refused to leave. Tough *expletive deleted*it for you.
With this one, I simply don't understand the law here. This is New York. I will bet real money that their real estate and escrow laws are at least as stringent as California's, where the home seller can get into all kinds of legal trouble if they fail to disclose a host of issues on the like fifty pages you have to fill out when you sell a property. So I don't get how this squatter can claim "a previous agreement with the former owners". If it wasn't stated in the escrow forms, or discovered in the title search, then the former owners and/or title company should have the liability here, and the squatter should have zero rights. At the very least, the former owners would have to take the house back.
Anyway, this guy needs to be shot.
https://twitchy.com/amy-curtis/2024/03/01/queens-squatter-nyp-n2393454
grampster:
I'll go with you and help.
BobR:
After shooting them can we drag their crap into the street and burn it. Just wait until those illegals being housed in private homes learn they are rooted after 30 days, in some places.
bob
230RN:
That's why horses and cattle are branded and they have official State Brand Inspectors so you can be sure you're hanging the right person.
"Is the house insured?" he asked meaningfully. I understand there are many fire hazards associated with that group of people.
Terry, 230RN
Bogie:
We have this in St. Louis:
https://youtu.be/Ol2_jBmiDsA?si=tj7syZxypTZNnAxy
The gentrified neighbors are rapidly become "conservative."
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version