In brief, neoconservatism is composed of a belief in social conservatism (often 'moderate' social conservatism), a belief in an interventionist foreign policy, and, most importantly, a refusal (on an ideological level) to oppose the existence of the welfare-state. Rather, the neconservative wants the superstate to exists, but he wants it to pursue 'conservative goals'. 'Moderation' and 'slow, non-revolutionary change' are beloved by Kristol.
Which simply proves the point that it means anything anyone wants it to mean.
Clinton seems to meet those criteria. I think the Mogadishu situation qualifies as interventionist foreign policy. Clinton certainly didn't oppose the welfare state.
If you want examples of Clinton as a (moderate) social conservative, I'd point to the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, the firing of Dr. Joycelyn Elders, and the fact that Clinton is a Christian (the stereotypical liberal is a Godless heathen). I guess it depends on what your definition of "moderate" is. :)
