I don't really see what difference it makes if homosexuality is nature or nurture, given that it's a consenting act between adults (and where it isn't, other laws already apply). So IMO it doesn't matter if they do it by choice, or if they are genetical predisposed to it. It doesn't affect me (other than ensuring that there will be more women available for me
), so I don't see why it should be any of my business, or of the government. (I suppose the discrimination/hate-crimes laws might therefore need checking, but I don't see any problem as long as the level of protection afforded is no more/less than for any comparable subject).
In contrast (given that the comparison has already been made), pedophilia involves the abuse of someone who cannot consent to the acts involved (not legally, and in almost all cases not at all). So it is inately harmful to others. If pedophilia is a choice, it is a wicked one. If it is genetic, then pedophiles are simply programmed to be abusive, and need to be dealt with on that basis (e.g. by locking them up indefinitely, or else taking more drastic measures).
If it's nurture, then, frankly, it's seriously abusive to "teach" it to children...
something about which they will later be educated and into which they will, with luck, be indoctrinated and inducted...
Who is "teaching" children homosexuality?
Where are children being "indoctrinated" and "inducted" into it?
