Read more:
https://www.ammoland.com/2023/09/court-filing-by-indian-police-defendants-contradicts-sheriffs-account-of-kloepfer-shooting/#ixzz8D2kvt7MAUnder Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
Court Filing by Indian Police Defendants Contradicts Sheriff’s Account of Kloepfer Shooting
Looks like the Reservation officers testified the Sheriff was on site contradicting what he said as well as the quote below. All the hardware and information was there to make this event go down peacefully, but none of it was used apparently.
They deny that he was ‘gunned down by the SWAT team.’ They deny that his and Mahler’s “lives are permanently harmed and disrupted.” They attest Kloepfer “appear[ed] to hold a weapon in his right hand” while acknowledging he “walked outside with his hands up and out in front of him.” They also say they were aware the deployed drone robot was being monitored, and “they were wearing intercom devices that included earpieces and a microphone connected to the inside of their helmets,” meaning police must have seen Kloepfer pick the drone up with his right hand.