I admire the willingn ess of the board members to follow their ideas through to their logical conclusion. I really do. It takes far more honesty than many people have these days. I think the leap made in the "If you support anti-necrophilia laws it's only a matter of time before the .gov throws you in jail for trying anal with your wife!!!!" type statements is a bit silly, but overall I'd say the libertarians on the board are very consistent with their beliefs.
That being said, I (just me personally now) think that if you find your line of argumentation leading to the ideal state being one where it is acceptable to bone your grandma's corpse (or sell it to someone down the street to do that to) then I perhaps think it might be time for a re-examination of your political views. But that's just me.
Look, if we take out the moral judgement and look at it logically, then, well, it's not hurting anyone but (we presume, or at least I presume) the person doing the humping.
Which leads to the usually libertarian/wicca stance of "do what you will as long as you don't hurt someone else".
By that logic, with the previously gain consent of the deseased or the consent of those who had a relasionship with the deseased, I guess it shouldn't be illeagle.
On the other hand, since the few folks on this planet who like banging dead people are so few and far between AND have some serious mental issues, I am more then cool with leaving this particular taboo illeagal, along with consesual insest and probably a few other things that I am too innocent to think people would actually do.
Cause its ewwy.
