R.I.P. Scout26
mendment House Floor Amendment 18Sponsor M. SorolisSummary Amend to limit to permitless concealed carry to Kentucky residents; require training in the use of firearms; require persons who carry concealed weapons to carry documentation of training; require persons who permitlessly concealed carry to successfully range fire a firearm at a target 11 of 20 times on a monthly basis.
Further proof that people who don't understand guns (or English) should not attempt to write laws pertaining to firearms. If I had a firearm that would only fire 11 times out of a 20-round magazine, I'd be heading to the gunsmith ASAP. I suspect that what this legislative brain trust intended was to require that a person be able to HIT a target 11 times out of 20 shots. Even then ... how large is the target, and what's the distance?
Further proof that people who don't understand guns (or English) should not attempt to write laws pertaining to firearms.
I wonder what their enforcement mechanism is supposed to be, on these permitlessly carry-concealing non-permit-holder holders. If you fail to successfully range fire your firearm at the firearm firing range, do they cancel your permitless permit, so that you're no longer permitted to have permission to permitlessly (concealedly) carry? It also sounds like they're all for permitlessly open-carrying, since they're making it so hard to permitlessly non-open-carry. Right?
I would assume the same that they use for the CC test.B-27 target at 7 yards.11 hits out of 20 shotsYou would have to be the worst shot in the world to not be able to do that, but people do fail it. That fact scares the heck out of me.
I am sure if you asked that question on an instructor's forum you would get all sorts of stories.
Apparently we're all going to shoot ourselves in the crotch now.With concealed carry law, don't whine if you shoot yourself in the crotchhttps://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/local/joseph-gerth/2019/03/04/kentucky-concealed-carry-law-add-gun-violence/3048630002/
If only he had a permit he would would have be "trained" not to shot himself in the crotch
Does anybody besides me, this old crotchety coot stuck in his ways, think that legally-required "proficiency tests" are inherent infringements?I can see them as individual requirements of individual instructors, but not as a matter of law.
Does anybody besides me, this old crotchety coot stuck in his ways, think that legally-required "proficiency tests" are inherent infringements?
Opponents worry lawmakers were too quick to pass the bill.
Kind of an updateThe law went into effect a couple of weeks ago. Actually went into effect June 27th, not July 1st.No blood in the streets.No Wild West duels in the street either.Body shops are not reporting thousands of cars full of bullet holes. The usual suspects are still shooting the usual suspects.Life goes on.
Everyone in your state died of internet deregulation long ago.