Author Topic: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?  (Read 5247 times)

Desertdog

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,360
'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« on: December 06, 2008, 10:48:40 PM »
'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
Chad Groening - OneNewsNow - 12/6/2008 4:00:00 AM
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=342568

A non-profit think tank says bringing back the misnamed Fairness Doctrine would be an "open invitation for political abuse."


The Independent Women's Forum (IWF) has joined a chorus of other concerned organizations in trying to warn the American public about the consequences if the Democratic-controlled Congress is able to reinstate the so-called "Fairness Doctrine." Allison Kasic, a spokeswoman for the IWF, believes the Fairness Doctrine is clearly misnamed.
 
"The 'Unfairness Doctrine' would be much better [because] it has a lot of potential to basically shut down and silence your critic, and it flies in the face of what this country stands for," she contends. "Among other things, it's basically an open invitation for political abuse, using this rhetoric of fairness to silence your critics."
 
Kasic points out that what makes proposals to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine particularly unfair is that it targets a specific medium, namely radio. "The fact that this regulation would go after, specifically, radio shows just how politically motivated it is because, in essence, they're going after conservatives by the sheer fact that conservatives have dominated talk radio over the past couple decades," she adds.
 
While liberals, according to Kasic, present themselves as victims of conservative talk radio, she notes it is their domination of the mainstream media that most encouraged the rise of talk radio, and the conservative right had little choice but to create a new forum for communication.

Standing Wolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,978
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2008, 11:00:30 PM »
Quote
While liberals, according to Kasic, present themselves as victims of conservative talk radio, she notes it is their domination of the mainstream media that most encouraged the rise of talk radio, and the conservative right had little choice but to create a new forum for communication.

Much as only whites can be racists, so can only leftist extremists be victims.
No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.

Monkeyleg

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,589
  • Tattaglia is a pimp.
    • http://www.gunshopfinder.com
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2008, 11:55:38 PM »
If the libs are really going to try this, then I suggest the Republicans try to kill it with a poison pill that requires fairness in all media: radio, TV, newspapers, magazines, rock concerts, movies...everything.

Imagine if NBC had to let Rush Limbaugh sit next to Brian Williams and interpret the liberal spin for conservative voters on the nightly news.

RaspberrySurprise

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,020
  • Yub yub Commander
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2008, 02:01:58 AM »
Quote
Imagine if NBC had to let Rush Limbaugh sit next to Brian Williams and interpret the liberal spin for conservative voters on the nightly news.

I might be tempted to get a TV and satellite service just to see that.
Look, tiny text!

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,776
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2008, 02:54:40 PM »
The problem as always is who is the judge of what is fair or not fair?
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2008, 03:24:33 PM »
If at first you don't succeed, shoot the winner.

That'd be what the democrats want.

longeyes

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,405
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2008, 03:30:38 PM »
The Fairness Doctrine is one of the prime canaries in the coal mine.  The next few years turn on how crazy the Left really is and how far they want to push.  If they want serious political trouble in America they know, or ought to know, just what to do.  The American people are only going to take so much.  Many will be looking at the Fairness Doctrine, new gun control proposals, and the prospect of an amnesty.  The Dems are well advised not to get too carried away by their "great opportunity."
"Domari nolo."

Thug: What you lookin' at old man?
Walt Kowalski: Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have messed with? That's me.

Molon Labe.

Don't care

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 486
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #7 on: December 07, 2008, 04:37:30 PM »
The "Fairness Doctrine" and the BCFRA (aka McCain-Feingold), together. Finally.

"Congress shall not make no law.........what?!"

George Washington would be sick; George Orwell would be proud; George Soros will be defacto dictator.

Silver Bullet

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,859
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #8 on: December 07, 2008, 10:34:11 PM »
If the libs are really going to try this, then I suggest the Republicans try to kill it with a poison pill that requires fairness in all media: radio, TV, newspapers, magazines, rock concerts, movies...everything.

This is what I've been pointing out for months.  The lefties claim that radio has a limited number of owners in a given area, or some such "rationale", but I have much more choice in radio stations than I do newspapers. 

And, you forgot the biggest source of one-sided propaganda:  public schools.

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2008, 11:17:23 PM »
This is what I've been pointing out for months.  The lefties claim that radio has a limited number of owners in a given area, or some such "rationale", but I have much more choice in radio stations than I do newspapers. 

Air America even failed on satellite. It was one push to listen to either America Right or America Left, which was Air America till they blew up. You could choose channel 166 or channel 167. Right beside each other, 24/7.

One had people like Michael Reagan and Laura Ingraham. The other had Al Franken and Randi Rhodes.

Guess which one people listened to?
« Last Edit: December 08, 2008, 11:26:29 AM by Manedwolf »

buzz_knox

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 357
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #10 on: December 08, 2008, 11:01:30 AM »
George Washington would be sick; George Orwell would be proud; George Soros will be defacto dictator.

Orwell would have a certain level of professional pride in his predictions coming true, but he'd be absolutely disgusted by this.  He wrote 1984 and Animal Farm as warnings against this kind of stupidity.  Unfortunately, we have failed to take his advice.

Tim L

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 206
    • TDLITWILLER
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #11 on: December 08, 2008, 01:11:49 PM »
Quote
Orwell would have a certain level of professional pride in his predictions coming true, but he'd be absolutely disgusted by this.  He wrote 1984 and Animal Farm as warnings against this kind of stupidity.  Unfortunately, we have failed to take his advice.

Actually I think his advice was looked upon as being a goal to aim for, instead of something to avoid.

Tim

makattak

  • Dark Lord of the Cis
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,022
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #12 on: December 08, 2008, 01:14:02 PM »
Actually I think his advice was looked upon as being a goal to aim for, instead of something to avoid.

Tim

Have you READ his books?

If you think he suggested it be a goal to aim for you haven't the SLIGHTEST idea what he was illustrating.
I wish the Ring had never come to me. I wish none of this had happened.

So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us. There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil. Bilbo was meant to find the Ring. In which case, you also were meant to have it. And that is an encouraging thought

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #13 on: December 08, 2008, 01:45:07 PM »
Have you READ his books?

If you think he suggested it be a goal to aim for you haven't the SLIGHTEST idea what he was illustrating.

He didn't suggest it as a goal to aim for, but I do suspect there are many in our society who mistake the book for a user manual.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

gunsmith

  • I forgot to get vaccinated!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,181
  • I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #14 on: December 09, 2008, 01:52:34 AM »
He didn't suggest it as a goal to aim for, but I do suspect there are many in our society who mistake the book for a user manual.

you are double plus ungood for thinking that =D
Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Rocket Man: "The need for booster shots for the immunized has always been based on the science.  Political science, not medical science."

just Warren

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,234
  • My DJ name is Heavy Cream.
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #15 on: December 18, 2008, 03:58:07 PM »
Actually it would be brought back by unpopular demand.
Member in Good Standing of the Spontaneous Order of the Invisible Hand.

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: 'Unfairness' Doctrine - back by popular demand?
« Reply #16 on: December 18, 2008, 04:47:45 PM »
He didn't suggest it as a goal to aim for, but I do suspect there are many in our society who mistake the book for a user manual.

Orwell was a socialist until the day he died, but he hated the corruption that goes with unchecked socialism and greed. He abhorred the Soviet Union, but he probably would have liked America with LBJ's Great Society had it been finished as LBJ designed.




Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536