Author Topic: SCOTUS -1:Newsome-0  (Read 1028 times)

Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,310
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,799
Re: SCOTUS -1:Newsome-0
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2020, 07:25:47 PM »
It shouldn't have needed to go that high.
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

cordex

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,661
Re: SCOTUS -1:Newsome-0
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2020, 08:13:40 PM »
The Harvest Rock Church auditorium is (or was) pretty nice. I went to several concerts held there back in the mid-90s before they owned it.

RoadKingLarry

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,841
Re: SCOTUS -1:Newsome-0
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2020, 09:04:18 PM »
They've made their ruling, now let's see them enforce it.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams

cordex

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,661
Re: SCOTUS -1:Newsome-0
« Reply #4 on: December 03, 2020, 10:11:27 PM »
They've made their ruling, now let's see them enforce it.
As far as I can tell, the ruling was just for the lower court to consider the case instead of dismissing it.

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,914
  • ...shall not be allowed.
Re: SCOTUS -1:Newsome-0
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2020, 01:23:54 AM »
Maybe somebody distributed four of these to the Court?



Terry takes off rapidly, leaving rubber on the sidewalk from his cane tip.  Screech  screech screech screech screech screech.

Pic credit in properties
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,310
Re: SCOTUS -1:Newsome-0
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2020, 02:55:14 AM »
As far as I can tell, the ruling was just for the lower court to consider the case instead of dismissing it.

Correct. The case was sent back to the lower court to be reconsidered in the light of the previous SCOTUS ruling in a similar case.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design