Author Topic: OK, how many of you have looked... (Read 6653 times)

grampster · « **on:** June 13, 2011, 08:26:08 AM »

at the pictures Weiner sent, especially the pic of "stubby".

For me, I have not. I haven't even had the slightest inclination to look at them.

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #1 on:** June 13, 2011, 08:49:06 AM »

You realize someone's going to post them to this thread now?

lee n. field · « **Reply #2 on:** June 13, 2011, 08:56:20 AM »

"Art's Grandma."

I doesn't take any great Google-Fu to pull up that lame little pic.

Jamisjockey · « **Reply #3 on:** June 13, 2011, 09:06:57 AM »

Quote from: The artist formerly known as fistful on June 13, 2011, 08:49:06 AM

You realize someone's going to post them to this thread now?

Doing so might get one to banned camp.

AJ Dual · « **Reply #4 on:** June 13, 2011, 09:07:12 AM »

Monkeyleg · « **Reply #5 on:** June 13, 2011, 09:10:13 AM »

To quote Scorpio, from "Dirty Harry": "My, that's a big one."

CNYCacher · « **Reply #6 on:** June 13, 2011, 09:13:13 AM »

I've seen it. It's been posted on an inset on a lot of the stories of the incident on news sites. It's pretty innocuous. I'm not sure what you are imagining

Chuck Dye · « **Reply #7 on:** June 13, 2011, 09:16:57 AM »

Some questions:

Pictures? Plural? In passing, on the tube, I have seen one low resolution shot of white briefs, figure I have seen more than I need to.

Quote from: grampster on June 13, 2011, 08:26:08 AM

...especially the pic of "stubby".

Did the fool dispense with the fabric? Are you giving away more than you intended?

Jamisjockey · « **Reply #8 on:** June 13, 2011, 09:54:24 AM »

The only shots I can find are the one in his undies. Again, not that lewd, but worse than the zardoz images we are so fond of. You can see a little definition, and they certainly violate the arts grammaw rule.

roo_ster · « **Reply #9 on:** June 13, 2011, 10:46:12 AM »

Latest (unconfirmed) skinny is that Weiner was juicing. Not carrots, but roids.

That would account for some defective reasoning on his part and increased libido leading him to do foolish things on the 'net.

Jamisjockey · « **Reply #10 on:** June 13, 2011, 10:53:23 AM »

Quote from: roo_ster on June 13, 2011, 10:46:12 AM

Latest (unconfirmed) skinny is that Weiner was juicing. Not carrots, but roids.

That would account for some defective reasoning on his part and increased libido leading him to do foolish things on the 'net.

The topless shots show a pretty fit guy, but if he was doing roids, he should get his money back from his dealer, cause he wasn't that beefed up.

roo_ster · « **Reply #11 on:** June 13, 2011, 11:11:01 AM »

Quote from: JamisJockey on June 13, 2011, 10:53:23 AM

The topless shots show a pretty fit guy, but if he was doing roids, he should get his money back from his dealer, cause he wasn't that beefed up.

Depends on his starting point. Old photos of him show him to be a super-skinny bird-chested weakling. He has definitely put on muscle the last few years.

Roids, HGH, and anti-ADD meds are quite the thing among the monied and/or privileged, these days. Legally proscribed by "anti-aging" & similar docs.

Doggy Daddy · « **Reply #12 on:** June 13, 2011, 11:12:58 AM »

Quote from: roo_ster on June 13, 2011, 11:11:01 AM

Depends on his starting point. Old photos of him show him to be a super-skinny bird-chested weakling. He has definitely put on muscle the last few years.

We talkin' about Carrot Top now?

DD

Bogie · « **Reply #13 on:** June 13, 2011, 12:26:44 PM »

No, no, and NO on that offspring of Zardoz and Barbarella...

Doggy Daddy · « **Reply #14 on:** June 13, 2011, 12:48:50 PM »

!!

Lanius · « **Reply #15 on:** June 13, 2011, 01:13:12 PM »

Why should I look at pictures of someone's Weiner, if right in my pants I have something that's superior by about ... not gonna say as it's not gracious

..

I really don't understand men interested in seeing junk that's not their own. Unless they're gay, in which case I understand..

White Horseradish · « **Reply #16 on:** June 13, 2011, 02:55:11 PM »

Quote from: Lanius on June 13, 2011, 01:13:12 PM

I really don't understand men interested in seeing junk that's not their own. Unless they're gay, in which case I understand..

What I don't understand is men calling their dangly bits "junk". I don't know about anybody else, but I certainly didn't pick up mine at the county dump...

Gowen · « **Reply #17 on:** June 13, 2011, 05:10:09 PM »

I have not looked and don't want to. From what you all have said, it's a very small threat.

BlueStarLizzard · « **Reply #18 on:** June 13, 2011, 05:20:26 PM »

Quote from: Gowen on June 13, 2011, 05:10:09 PM

I have not looked and don't want to. From what you all have said, it's a very small threat.

If he's on Roids, it very well be a peanut by now.

Lee · « **Reply #19 on:** June 13, 2011, 05:36:11 PM »

No. I've just been waiting for the media to start calling his unborn child "the little weiner". I feel kinda bad for the guy...his wife is traveling the world with her other husband (hillary) while he's at home living a fantasy life.

41magsnub · « **Reply #20 on:** June 13, 2011, 05:41:35 PM »

nope, haven't looked. The whole thing is an embarrassment.

Hawkmoon · « **Reply #21 on:** June 13, 2011, 06:26:17 PM »

Quote from: Lee on June 13, 2011, 05:36:11 PM

No. I've just been waiting for the media to start calling his unborn child "the little weiner". I feel kinda bad for the guy...his wife is traveling the world with her other husband (hillary) while he's at home living a fantasy life.

You feel sorry for that turd-bird? He's a classic loser. Even he knows his political career is ended, but he can't quit like an even partially self-respecting MAN would do, because he doesn't know any other way to earn (and I use the term very loosely) a living other than at the public dole.

It's his wife I feel sorry for. Although I look at her photos and then read the articles referring to her as "glamorous," and I'm left wondering how many wives he actually has.

Lanius · « **Reply #22 on:** June 13, 2011, 07:50:20 PM »

Isn't he one of them lawyer types?

230RN · « **Reply #23 on:** June 14, 2011, 12:15:23 AM »

Ain't they all?

That's why we have so many laws. They keep making the legal structure more complex. Job security for them.

Have neither seen nor sought the picture(s?).

I finally figured out what "Roids" were.

Slowpoke brain.

I figure if Wiener is so stupid as to spread sexually-related things (though I've not seen them) on the 'net, he's too stupid to make our laws.

What's his voting record on RKBA?

Oh, wait, he's from Noo Yawk, right?

He's screwing up the Machine. Remember Tammany Hall?

AJ Dual · « **Reply #24 on:** June 14, 2011, 01:39:03 AM »

Quote from: Lanius on June 13, 2011, 07:50:20 PM

Isn't he one of them lawyer types?

No.

As far as I can tell, he has no skills or background OTHER than that as a politician. He's not a lawyer, and doesn't even really have much background in the make-work "community organizer" social service .orgs the current KOTUS has besides his law degree and state legislature experience.

He was in a real pickle as is because he was low man on the totem pole when his district was to be disbanded when NY lost a seat in the House due to the 2008 census anyway.

So now he probably won't even get a job with some libtard think-tank...

News:

Author Topic: OK, how many of you have looked... (Read 6653 times)