Just read about this incident, and how the homeless advocate and BLM spokesperson both stated something to the effect that the officer never should have drawn his firearm, and that an officer is expected to take those kinds of risks. Then read on FB some crap about how a knife isn't deadly force justifying gunfire...
and I got worried. People in jury pools read this garbage. People in jury pools will believe it. For us as armed citizens, we don't want anyone selling the idea that a knife isn't a deadly threat, and that deadly force is not an appropriate/justified response to a knife. Bad precedent for any situation where an armed citizen may need to fire against a knife-armed assailant. And, another thing. Too many people think that LEOs are allowed to use deadly force where citizens are not. Somewhere, people will conclude that "if a cop can't shoot a man with a knife, why can Jon Citizen be allowed to legally do so?" Hope this trend gets shut down right now.